Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,765   Posts: 1,516,355   Online: 1011
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    36cm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Northeast U.S.
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    575

    One film. One developer. One dilemma.

    I've reached a point where I clearly see I must settle on one film and developer and master it. For two weeks I've reviewed my options and combed through Internet images to find combos with the "look" that most suits me. My convoluted final thoughts follow. Your input is appreciated.

    - I shoot medium format (Hasselblad, Perkeo, Rolleiflex), 4x5 and 35mm in that order of frequency. Serious stuff on MF and 4x5; travel photos with the missus on 35mm. Ideally, I want a film available in all three formats.

    - I primarily shoot landscapes and am beginning to get into studio portraiture (with a couple of 400 w/s strobes). I'm useless at street shooting and have little interest in it.

    - I'm meticulous in processing (tank and Jobo CPE2).

    - I prefer traditional films to synthetic grain films.

    Here are my combo leanings:

    FP4/Rodinal - Pros: By far my favorite look. Cons: Is it too slow for handheld work and for 4x5 work without powerful lighting? Limited push flexibility? Too grainy in 35mm? Conclusion: My heart says yes, my mind says I'm an idiot because it's too limiting.

    TX400/HC110 and/or Xtol - Pros: Second favorite look. Better speed. So classic; so flexible. Cons: Kodak don't make it in all three formats. Maybe too much grain with HC110. Conclusion: Doesn't cut the mustard if I have to juggle TX400 and TXP320 depending on format. Kodak, you're a tease.

    HP5/HC110 - Pros: Almost Tri-X. Most dependable product source. What I'm primarily using now. Cons: I want to beat the gray out of it. Maybe too much grain in smaller formats.

    HP5/Xtol - See HP5/HC110. Even better speed, less grain issues, but maybe too genteel.

    Acros/Deltas/TMax's - While my mind loves them, my heart says no. If TMY2 could raise my pulse, I'd be there in a minute. Unfortunately, every comparison of t-grain work against traditional film work confirms to me that I strongly prefer traditional emulsions.

    Hope you can help. I've come as far as I can on my own. And I know you can achieve whatever look you want with virtually any combo once you've mastered it. Nonetheless, I'd like to start this long path off on the most right foot.

    Thanks,
    Leo
    "There is a time and place for all things, the difficulty is to use them only in their proper time and places." -- Robert Henri

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Armidale, NSW, Australia
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    264
    I love TMY2 but then I can also see the attraction of Tri-X. Certainly if you loved TMAX it would solve your dilemma ;-) I'd go with your heart and 'enjoy' working within it's limitations. Let's face it, if we all really wanted to have 'no limitations' we'd probably be shooting with a D3 or something...

  3. #3
    36cm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Northeast U.S.
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    575
    Quote Originally Posted by mesh View Post
    I'd go with your heart and 'enjoy' working within it's limitations.
    Thanks Mesh. I guess my question is, are the limitations FP4/Rodinal too great to practically use it for all my work and actually enjoy it?
    "There is a time and place for all things, the difficulty is to use them only in their proper time and places." -- Robert Henri

  4. #4
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,172
    Images
    148
    My choice for hand-held 5x4 work is HP5, I'd prefer Delta 400 but it's not made in sheet film but I shoot it by choice in 120 in 6x6 and also my 617 camera.

    I used to shoot Tmax 100 & 400 but have problems getting Kodak films (outside Europe & UK) whereas Ilford B&W films are far easier to find as is Foma, also when Kodak films are available they are considerably more expensive.

    As you like HP5 why not use if for handheld work and FP4 for finer garain & small formats etc.

    Ian

  5. #5
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,531
    Images
    122
    Rather than limit yourself to one film it might be a better idea to give yourself two options depending on the light available and tripod use/hand held. I have settled on using FP4+ and HP5+ and will choose which one to use depending on conditions (weather usually).


    Steve.
    Last edited by Steve Smith; 08-26-2010 at 07:21 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #6
    Laurent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    France
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,209
    Blog Entries
    22
    Images
    137
    If I was to settle on only one film/developer combo, I'd stay with HP5+ / X-Tol.

    It has the speed I need (most of the time at least), I like the negs I get with X-Tol (plus X-Tol is somewhat environment friendly !), and I like the look of the prints I make with it.

    When I feel I need more speed, then I use Delta 3200 (in HC110), when I need finer grain then it's Pan-F in X-Tol.
    Laurent

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast (Oscar Wilde)

    My APUG Blog

  7. #7
    36cm2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Northeast U.S.
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    575
    Ian and Steve, I'm using a two film combo now (HP5 and Acros both in HC110). I work a lot and shoot infrequently, so switching between the two is more distracting than if I shot regularly. Plus, if I keep using two films, then I have to change the title of this thread.

    I'm not a huge fan of HP5's "creaminess", but it's reliable and I trust it won't disappear. I agree with Laurent that HP5/Xtol is probably the most flexible across the board option and will allow me to print 16x20 in the larger formats, which is important to me.

    If I go FP4/rodinal I think I'll be very happy with the MF and LF kits, but the 35 is a conundrum. I guess it's just a matter of compromise.
    "There is a time and place for all things, the difficulty is to use them only in their proper time and places." -- Robert Henri

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,208
    Images
    21
    How fast do you rate FP4+ in Rodinal? I've shot a fair amount of the stuff handheld in 35mm while travelling, but that's at box speed (with other developers---I haven't been bitten by the Rodinal bug). If you have to downrate it to ASA 50 or so, that would indeed be pretty limiting (especially if you lose another stop to a yellow filter).

    Also, is there a reason you're not considering the faster films in Rodinal? It seems like a 400-speed film in a speed-losing developer would at least put you in a nice flexible speed range.

    Personally, I like HP5+ in almost anything, but where you see "I want to beat the grey out of it" I see "what a nice rich tonal palette you have", so my taste may not be a good guide for yours. :-)

    -NT
    Nathan Tenny
    San Diego, CA, USA

    The lady of the house has to be a pretty swell sort of person to put up with the annoyance of a photographer.
    -The Little Technical Library, _Developing, Printing, And Enlarging_

  9. #9
    Mark Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,625
    Images
    151
    I understand. I'd suggest two films given what you are doing. FP4 for LF and MF (tripod anyway?) and TX for 35. Develop the FP4 in Rodinal and the TX in HC110 or xtol. You already know you like the look so why compromise. You might try FP4 in xtol if you want to narrow to a single developer. It looks great in it.

  10. #10
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,172
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by 36cm2 View Post
    Ian and Steve, I'm using a two film combo now (HP5 and Acros both in HC110). I work a lot and shoot infrequently, so switching between the two is more distracting than if I shot regularly. Plus, if I keep using two films, then I have to change the title of this thread.
    I used to use mainly one film APX100 but your problem is working hand-held with 5x4 requires a faster film.

    It's far better to work with two related films ie FP4/HP5, Tmax 100/400, Delta 100/400 where possible because they have some similarities. It's always a compromise but as soon as you want to work without a tripod you need a choice of medium & fast films.

    If you can tame 35mm HP5to your liking in Xtol then that's an option.

    Ian

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin