Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,834   Posts: 1,582,395   Online: 890
      
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Christopher Walrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Milton, DE, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,980
    Blog Entries
    29
    Images
    19

    Why 2 different D-72 recipes and 2 different G-201 recipes from same source

    I was going through my old Focal Press Encyclopedia and was looking at the M.-Q. charts and found an interesting anomoly. 2 different recipes each for Kodak D-72 and for Gevaert G.201. As follows . . .

    Gevaert G-201
    Warm Water - 500cc for both
    Metol - 0.4g and 1.5g
    Hydroquinone - 1.5g and 6.0g
    Sodium sulphite, anhyd - 12.0g and 50.0g
    SOdium carbonate, anhyd - 8.0g and 32.0g
    Pottasium Bromide - 0.5g and 2.0g
    Add cold water to make - 1L for both

    I just noticed that the second recipe is nearly 4 times the strength of the first. Is this a concentrate?

    Kodak D-72
    Warm Water - 500cc for both
    Metol - 0.5g and 1.6g
    Hydroquinone - 2.0g and 6.0g
    Sodium sulphite, anhyd - 7.5g and 22.5g
    Sodium carbonate, anhyd - 11.0g and 34.0g
    Potassium bromide - 0.3g and 0.9g
    Add cold water to make - 1L for both
    And I have just noticed that the second recipe here seems to be roughly three times the strength of the first. So same supposition. Concentrate?

    Also, both first recipes are listed as standard contrast. Both second recipes are listed as, simply, 'Contrast' developers.

    Just curious but would love your thoughts and ideas.
    Thank you.
    CWalrath
    APUG BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE
    DE Darkroom

    "Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti

  2. #2
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,427
    Images
    148
    First because sometimes the Formulae are given at the working strength not the concentrate, that goes for both G.201 and D72. Often it was done for comparative reasons, it's what's in the final working solution you need to compared. So they are exactly the same Formulae.

    With D72 and 3 or 4 other Kodak packaged developers the weights in the commercial formulae were rounded off for Kodak consumer publications.

    Kodak had different recommendations for D72 in the US and UK, it's classified as a Contrast developer in the UK, and it wasn't recommended for papers and was sold as a film developer at one time, instead Kodak recommended D163 for papers. Later that changed

    Ian
    Last edited by Ian Grant; 08-29-2010 at 12:56 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: add

  3. #3
    Christopher Walrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Milton, DE, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,980
    Blog Entries
    29
    Images
    19
    Thanks, Ian. Appreciate it alot.
    Thank you.
    CWalrath
    APUG BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE
    DE Darkroom

    "Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin