Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,826   Posts: 1,582,032   Online: 787
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    maarten m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    gent belgium
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    220

    push ADOX 100 to 400 or above?

    hello,

    does anyone here know what i can expect if i push ADOX CHS 100 to 400 or even higher (800, 1600)?
    i plan on developing in ADONAL (RODINAL), but still have to work out the time ...

    regards,
    maarten.

  2. #2
    AmsterdamMartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    79
    Images
    5
    Het is daar helemaal niet voor gemaakt, die ouderwetse film. En Rodinal uit 1890 ook niet.
    Zal wel erg kunstenaars-achtig worden, met ENORME korrel. Het contrast zal extreem hoog zijn.
    Ik schat dat je een soort Louis Jacques-Mande Daguerre in 1838 krijgt.
    Maar wellicht krijg je er iets moois mee in bepaalde situaties, en zeker niemand anders zal zulke foto's maken.
    Oh en de tijd ? begin maar met een uur of zo, stand development. En werk dan door met verdubbelingen.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,021
    Images
    4
    It'll work like any other underexposure/overdevelopment. It adds contrast, and turns what would normally be low-toned texture and detail into solid black. The more you underexpose it (i.e. the higher you rate it), the more extreme these effects will be. You will also get a high amount of graininess, but the larger the format, the less grain you will see at a given print size. It will be quite grainy in 35mm. The film is flat (meaning low in contrast) as it is, so it will survive the push quite well.

    Why do you want to do it? Are you after a contrasty and grainy look?
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  4. #4
    hobbes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Warsaw, Poland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    63
    Images
    19
    Hi Maarten, Generally speaking pushing iso100 materials over iso200+ is bad idea. A workaround can be a developer that raises speed of the film, like Diafine.
    cheers
    Dominik
    http://distantmoon.pl

  5. #5
    piu58's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Leipzig, Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    605
    Why do you want to push that film? I recommend to use a faster one. The overall result will be much better.
    Rodinal ist not a good idea for pushing because it tends to block the highlights. I recommend a phenidone based solvent devoloper if you need more speed from a film. You can used undiluted Microphen for that.
    ---
    Uwe Pilz

  6. #6
    maarten m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    gent belgium
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    220
    hey,

    well, i was just thinking if it would work, that's all.
    i found data about developing for 24min in Rodinal 1+50 if pushed to 400.
    so i guess someone has been doing it before

    maarten.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,934
    I wouldn't push 100 past 400. Maybe 400 past 1600. That is about it.

    Jeff

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,021
    Images
    4
    "Why do you want to push that film? I recommend to use a faster one. The overall result will be much better.
    Rodinal ist not a good idea for pushing because it tends to block the highlights. I recommend a phenidone based solvent devoloper if you need more speed from a film. You can used undiluted Microphen for that. "

    The "better" result is not the sharper or more grain-free result, but the one that is closest to what is envisioned. Criteria must be named in order to make the word "better" really mean anything. Why not just explain what the push in Rodinal will do without passing judgment on whether or not this is "better" than something else?
    Last edited by 2F/2F; 12-11-2010 at 04:53 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  9. #9
    piu58's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Leipzig, Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    605
    > Why not just explain what the push in Rodinal will do ...
    With Rodinal you probably not get the box speed. It may be you get real 200 or 250 ASA from a 400 film. If you expose it like 1600 that is underexposing the film nearly 3 stops.

    If you underexpose the film more than one stop the shadows get much too less light. No developer in the world will get them back: Your shadows (and not only the deepest) will be empty.

    The mid tones get the light what normally the shadows get - 3 stops too less. To raise them in a printable are you have to overdevelop the film dramatically. It may be that you need twice the time. Then you get the mid tones in an acceptable range, but they are very contrasty. But that may you want to.

    If you develop a film double time all highlights come to totally black in the negative or in the near of it. To prevent this you could use a developer which solves back silver. But Rodinal does not work in that way. The highlights will be blocked and without structure in the positive.

    If you over-develop a film with Rodinal it gets grainy.

    So let us summarize what you get:
    - You lose the shadows, they are empty
    - You lose the highlights, they are blocked
    - The mid tones are harsh
    - The film is grainy.

    If you'd use a film with a higher speed you'd get
    - Open shadows
    - Graduated highlights
    - Fine graduated (not too contrasty) mid tones
    - But grain

    If you'd use the 400 film but a sulphite-rich Phenidone based developer you'd get
    - Empty shadows, but slightly better than in Rodinal. Phenidone gets half a stop more speed.
    - Highlights with some structures in it. Not optimal but better than with Rodinal.
    - Mid tones less contrasty in comparison to Rodinal.
    - Lesser grainy results
    ---
    Uwe Pilz

  10. #10
    maarten m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    gent belgium
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    220
    With Rodinal you probably not get the box speed. It may be you get real 200 or 250 ASA from a 400 film
    you mean even HP5+ at 400 will be 1-stop underexposed with rodinal and would need a 1-stop overcompensation in developing?

    all films, if developed in rodinal, will come out more grainy but if used at box-speed, detail in shadows and highlights?
    and if pushed: loss of detail in both highlights ànd shadows, but with "okay" midtones?

    maarten.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin