Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,946   Posts: 1,194,825   Online: 639
      
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3456789
Results 81 to 82 of 82
  1. #81
    Bill Burk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    861
    Images
    20
    I have to fix a few things (clean the enlarger lens) and re-run the development time tests now that I have gotten more consistent at developing.

    For my test I used the sensitometer to expose a sheet of TMY-2. I developed the film and read on the densitometer that I was close to ASA gradient so I put this negative in my enlarger and made a print of it.

    Knowing which sensitometer step made the patches on the print, I graphed (with x-axis reversed) Log MCS and resulting print density.

    Now all I need to do is convert my spotmeter readings to MCS. Then I need to figure out what other factors interfere with predictions.

  2. #82
    Stephen Benskin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    822
    I've attached something I did in Mathcad. It shows film plane exposure H from the metered exposure point down into the shadows in non flare and flare conditions. With flare you achieve the same exposure from a RD one stop further down into the shadows. Assuming these conditions, you can use the easier to control and interpret non flare conditions to calculate the film speed.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Exposure equation 12%.jpg  

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3456789


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin