Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,452   Posts: 1,570,408   Online: 1146
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    137

    aerographic panatomic x...silver content.

    sometimes one reads of the term silver rich in connection with old generation films.
    kodaks aerial films or certain eastern european films.
    would kodak really put more silver in a product than in another.
    did older films have a lot more silver in them and does it make any difference.
    thanks.
    i assume films today because of high silver prices would have the bare min required?

  2. #2
    msa
    msa is offline
    msa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    148
    Yes, but Pan-X is such a great film, and slow enough that most of it has held up pretty well.

    I'm not sure why you'd try and reclaim silver from it (you'd have to incinerate it, and what a waste of film) -- just get it out of your fixer later.

    Less to do with cost, really, since silver was still cheap several years ago when all the new emulsions showed up.

    I think most of it has to do with advances in coating techniques.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,832
    Images
    24
    i was told by a retired chemist who did all the lab-work
    for the photo lab index that a lot of the old films were silver rich,
    and a lot of the "modern" films were filled with "poly vinyl fillers" when they cut the silver
    i have wanted to talk to him for ages about this and other things, but
    last i spoke with him was 9 years ago, and he died last year or the year before ....

  4. #4
    Stephen Frizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,384
    Images
    174
    I may be way off the mark here but i thought older emulsions were more rich in silver because the older technologies had a higher percentage of inactive silver in the emulsion/ the newer emulsions were optimized for their silver sensitivity and so less silver was needed? something like that?....
    "Its my profession to hijack time" ~ Stephen Frizza.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati Ohio USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    670
    Silver alone does nothing and will not tell you how good or bad a product it. It is the entire emulsion that gives you the image. Newer emulsions like Tmax 400 use less silver and are in many ways far superior to older films. Also the silver in a film or paper is just pennies worth. 90% of the cost comes from other factors. Nobody would cut the silver if it really hurt the quality. Would you buy an inferior product that cost 5% less?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    137
    sorry..
    i am not trying to reclaim the silver..
    just interested in the the term silver rich?
    i would be interested to see a battle between 35mm aerographic pantomic x and the many ways superior tmax 400 : )

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati Ohio USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    670
    That battle was already fought between Tmax 100 and Panatomic-X. Tmax 100 won and Kodak stopped making Panatomic-X long ago.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Mundelein, IL
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,002
    Images
    1
    I think "silver rich" is just the term used by the guys hawking the Aerial Panatomic-X on their website, isn't it? Sure *sounds* like it must be better!

    Duncan

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    137
    i was thinking of the aerial panatomic x that the u2 plane still use's.
    the usaf seem to still like it...so pan x won that small battle.
    kodak are making it for someone or they would have stop production..

  10. #10
    hrst's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,300
    Images
    1
    Take a look at this old thread on the emulsion making forum; http://www.apug.org/forums/forum205/...rich-myth.html

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin