I get my film from 7Dayshop.com but I can heartily recommend RK photographic for your paper. They mistakenly sent (and charged) me a box of 50 16x20 Ilford MGIV RC (instead of 16x12). Anyway, rather than send it back, they said I could keep the 16x20 and pay only for 16x12! They were the cheapest by quite a margin and also very quick. Welcome back BTW.
Norman is an island.Time and tide wait for Norman.
I've heard great things about Kodak Plus-X, so it may be worth it to at least try a roll or two. Otherwise, I'm glad PanF+ is getting a lot of good recommendations on this thread. I'm testing it and FP4+ next.
I am interested in very slow films of 'times gone past'
Does anyone know of the slowest film made these days?
I have used delta and whilst its a great film, its 'not the look I am after'
Hard to put my finger on but (for now) I am trying to reproduce old pictures and experience the 'fun' of past photographers if that makes sense?
120 is cheaper by the roll though not by the shot. I actually prefer the fact that it takes fewer shots to finish a 120 roll. And those big negatives are great, since you effectively enlarge the grain less MF appears quite a bit smoother when printed.
Originally Posted by salan
That was my stock film before.
Thanks for the suggestions keep them comming!
I will prob try films in 35mm first before 120 ( cost!).
Now how to justify a lf camera to the wife!