Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,690   Posts: 1,548,845   Online: 944
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    David Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    near Dallas, TX USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,316
    Images
    6

    Old Tri-X, new development times

    I shot some expired, but refrigerated 120 Tri-x recently. Before processing, I pulled the latest Kodak data from the website and noticed that the development times are vastly different from the last time I developed any Tri-X!!! .

    I know that the film is now different. What I am not sure of, is if the film I shot is the new stuff. I left the boxes in the trash (in Germany) and only have the exposed rolls. I am "almost" certain that it is the old Tri-x, but are there any identifiers that I can use to tell for sure?

    My default is to use D-76 at 1:1, since those times have changed only slightly. I was planning on using HC 110, but the times are really different!

    The Tmax developer is the same (at least at 68 degress), but I've never used it on Tri-x. All comments appreciated.

    Thanks!

    David

  2. #2
    ann
    ann is offline

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,879
    Images
    26
    there has been a serious out cry about the changes with the "new trix and hc110. Rumor has it Kodak made a mistake (heaven forbid) and rather than own up; life has gone on.
    For the rest of us we have been using the same times we had been using with the "old". Negatives have been fine.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    970
    Images
    3
    David, I think the HC110 Dil B times are printed wrong for the new Tri-X. Looking at the film box chart it shows 3 3/4 mins at 20C. I have been using the new with my old Tri-X development time of 6 minutes 20C Dil B. The 3 3/4 mins looks more like the Dil A time.

    I really think Kodak misprinted these times.

    I can't say the same about the other developers though...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    660
    Timely thread for me at least. A couple of months ago I finished the last of my "old" Tri-X Pan (TX 5063 if I recall the film edge correctly) in 35mm. About an hour ago I printed a 5063 first/test print of a laughing boy under the impossibly luminous "cloudy bright" conditions unique to New England in early winter. The tonality is just about enough to make one weep.

    Can folks give me their take on the proposed replacements for Tri-X Pan? Of particular interest to me are those Winogrand highlights. Do films such as Ilford FP4, new Tri-X and who knows what else (Efke, Forte, etc) provide such breathtaking highlight range and gradation? To date I have been using Tri-X Pan and D-76 1:1. I feel something like a sense of grief over the loss of the TXP, but I am hoping that my worry is unfounded.

    Best,
    Jon

  5. #5
    ThomHarrop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    172
    Images
    6
    I have had 60 students use the new Tri-X and the first 20 switched to the new times as the basis for their Zone System testing. It was a disaster. We switched back to the old times and everything was much better. I am not sure what Kodak has done here but I haven't found any of the new times to be even close. The only thing I can suggest is retest to find a speed point and calculate new times from there.

    I just ordered 10 rolls of Efke 120 from J and C and I will post results after I have had time to test it. I have heard good things about it but one never knows. A Tzech photographer I used to know swore by one of the European films but I will have to go back in to some ancient magazine files to find out which one it was.

    Found it. The film was called Orwo. He loved the highlights he got with it, for what it's worth.

  6. #6
    ThomHarrop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    172
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by ThomHarrop
    I have had 60 students use the new Tri-X and the first 20 switched to the new times as the basis for their Zone System testing. It was a disaster. We switched back to the old times and everything was much better. I am not sure what Kodak has done here but I haven't found any of the new times to be even close. The only thing I can suggest is retest to find a speed point and calculate new times from there.

    I just ordered 10 rolls of Efke 120 from J and C and I will post results after I have had time to test it. I have heard good things about it but one never knows. A Tzech photographer I used to know swore by one of the European films but I will have to go back in to some ancient magazine files to find out which one it was.

    Found it. The film was called Orwo. He loved the highlights he got with it, for what it's worth.
    Just discovered that J and C carries Orwo in 120. It is 125 ISO. I will order some and let you know what I find.

  7. #7
    lee
    lee is offline
    lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth TX
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,913
    Images
    8
    I shot old trix in Mexico with Jorge and my development times are 6 min with HC110 dil be 68f. I expose at about 160 ei. This is 8x10 film.

    lee\c

  8. #8
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,034
    Images
    30
    I've been shooting it at iso 400 and developing in xtol 1:1 for 8 minutes which is the old time. I've also done it 1+2 for 10 minutes and it comes out great.

  9. #9
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,320
    Images
    20
    The new Orwo films are rebranded Ilford films. I don't believe that Orwo is actually manufacturing film currently. Orwo was the East German half of Agfa.

    New J&C Classic 400 (or ClassicPan 400 from fotoimpex.de) has some of that old Tri-X Pan (320) character--good density range, long toe, traditional grain structure. I've been shooting both lately in sheet sizes, until my old TXT runs out. I think TXT might look a bit sharper, and TXT is certainly more scratch resistant for tray processing, but visually, I can't say that I like one more than the other. CP400 has the attraction of being the same emulsion in all formats. I've posted a few CP400/ABC pyro (5x7" and 6x9cm) and one TXT/PMK shot (4x5") in the Standard Gallery--

    http://www.apug.org/gallery/showgall...=500&ppuser=60

  10. #10
    clogz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,837
    Images
    114
    Orwo is no longer manufactured.
    Digital is best taken with a grain of silver.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin