Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,693   Posts: 1,548,965   Online: 784
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,299
    Images
    302

    Actual negative size 6x6

    Hello,

    I recently had the pleasure of using a Hasselblad 500C/M with a Planar 2.8 lens. Wonderful camera indeed. I used it alongside my own older Rolleiflex, and was surprised to see after I developed the negs that the actual area of the 6x6 negatives were smaller while exposed in the Hasselblad.
    Is this a commonly known thing, and if so, is there a reason for it? It seems to me that the larger the negative, the better the quality.
    The difference is only a couple of millimeters in all four directions, but nonetheless surprising!

    Thankful for enlightenment,

    - Thomas
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  2. #2
    Snapper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brighton, England
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    224
    Images
    15
    In my experience, 6x6 is actually 5.6x5.6, which is a lot harder to say.

    I'm guessing that maybe it's a conversion thing - were original '6x6's actually 2 1/4" x 2 1/4" and that converts to 5.6cm and not 6cm.

  3. #3
    noseoil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,898
    Images
    17
    Out of my old Mamiya C330 the actual film image is very close to 2" x 2".

  4. #4
    papagene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Western Mass., USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,193
    Images
    116
    The image area will vary depending on what camera the film was run through. A couple of mm's won't lessen the quality noticable at all.
    gene
    gene LaFord


    Long live Ed "Big Daddy" Roth!!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    "I don't care about Milwaukee or Chicago." - Yvon LeBlanc

  5. #5
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,299
    Images
    302
    Yes,

    I suppose the image area could vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. In another thread I brought up a problem with light leaks in 120 film rolls, and with the Hasselblad, it was less of a problem, since the edge of the image was farther from the edge of the film.

    Gene, you're probably right, that a couple of mm's here and there probably won't make much of a difference. Especially when the camera is handled by such a master artist as myself... hehe

    Thanks,

    - Thomas
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,241
    Images
    9
    I think it is the poor quality control and false advertisment by those lazy swedes. Anyone who owns a Hassy needs to just ditch it. In fact I will take it off your hands so you won't have to deal with getting less negative space....oh yeah you better send those crappy lenses too. For all we know the 150 mm might be 148mm. I can't let people continue to use substandard equipment.
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  7. #7
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by mark
    I think it is the poor quality control and false advertisment by those lazy swedes. Anyone who owns a Hassy needs to just ditch it. In fact I will take it off your hands so you won't have to deal with getting less negative space....oh yeah you better send those crappy lenses too. For all we know the 150 mm might be 148mm. I can't let people continue to use substandard equipment.
    Get in line!! I was here first!!
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  8. #8
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,299
    Images
    302
    Hey now,

    I spent the first 29 years of my life living in Sweden. It's a good thing I have a good sense of humor about these things...
    You know, if there are any leftovers, I'll gladly take a Hasselblad as well. I will even be happy to trade my Rolleiflex, which is superior, at least negative size wise...

    Seriously, it was such a pleasure to work with the Hasselblad, that I have decided to put everything else on halt, and just save every nickle and dime I can scrape up until I can afford one on my own. What a beautiful camera!

    - Thomas
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin