Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,714   Posts: 1,514,727   Online: 847
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Fintan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ireland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,793
    Images
    2

    Rodinal vs Xtol for Tri-X

    Xtol is my choice developer for Tri-X. There are so many Rodinal fans on the board here i'm thinking of trying it.

    Can anyone say what difference to expect with Rodinal?

  2. #2
    bmac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,156
    Images
    9
    Stronger, Sharper grain for one.
    hi!

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,576
    Images
    27
    Check unblinkingeye.com for a good article on using both Xtol and Rodinal together..maybe the best of both worlds. Have not tried it myself so can not say, but have been hoping to try the combo. A small bottle of Rodinal is pretty cheap.
    Last edited by photomc; 09-15-2004 at 06:16 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: correct address
    Mike C

    Rambles

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Utica, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    18

    Rodinal/XTOL/Tri-X

    Let me suggest XTOL 1:1 for 14 min at 68°F. Agitate 30 sec the 1st minute then 10 sec every third minute thereafter.

    This will give you exceptional sharpness with XTOL without the grain problems produced by Rodinal.

    Try EI 320 as a starting point for this development approach. You might have to back off to 250 or so.

    Another developer you might consider is Photographer's Formulary TFX-2. VERY nice stuff.

  5. #5
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,034
    Images
    30
    I must disagree with the above recommendation of xtol 1:1 for 14@68.

    THAT IS WAY TOO LONG.

    I've been doing a lot of tri-x lately in xtol 1:1 for 8 minutes. I rate the film at 400 and they come out great.

    Just my 2 cents.

  6. #6
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by photomc
    Check unblinkingeye.com for a good article on using both Xtol and Rodinal together..maybe the best of both worlds. Have not tried it myself so can not say, but have been hoping to try the combo. A small bottle of Rodinal is pretty cheap.
    I used this combo and loved it for 35mm and medium format. Best of both worlds is right. Excellent acutance and definition. If I hadn't jumped into LF, I would still be using it. I will see if I still have a scan and post it in the Technical Gallery.
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  7. #7
    Neil Souch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    West Cornwall, UK.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    332
    Images
    18
    I use a lot of 35mm TRI X and switched from Rodinal to XTOL some time ago. Each developer works well with TRI X but I prefer my TRI X in neat XTOL. I usually dev for 7.5 mins @ 20C (rated at 400 ISO) and only do six films through one litre then throw it away. Great negs and easy to print. Interestly HP5 + also goes well in XTOL at 8 mins. I mainly keep Rodinal for the Konica infraded and Kodak infrared films.

    If any one has experiece / times for Neopan 400 in XTOL I would be interested to hear about these.

    Summary: XTOL / Rodinal are both excellent developers but after quite a bit of use of each I prefer XTOL for my work (mainly landscapes).

    Give them a go - Rodinal is cheap and will last for ages.

    Neil.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Århus, Denmark
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,102
    Images
    16
    Tri-X and Rodinal is a very nice combo, but when I use it I rate the film 250-320 and develop for 11-12 minutes in Rodinal 1+50 (30 sec agit. in the beginning and 5 inversions every minute.)
    Sharp and grainy (but it's the beautiful Tri-X grain )

  9. #9
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Hawley
    I will see if I still have a scan and post it in the Technical Gallery.
    I posted a scan in the Tech Gallery, but its not Tri-X. Very similar though in what I was trying to illustrate.
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Utica, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    18

    XTOL & Tri-X

    If you had taken the time to actually read the post you would note that the agitation pattern calls for agitation only every third minute.

    This amplifies edge effects/acutance but mandates an extra 50% of development time.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin