Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,957   Posts: 1,558,043   Online: 1106
      
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    69
    Images
    13

    Testing two films in sunlight

    Hi all,

    Okay, so I'm not really "testing", just having some fun.

    I had a roll of 35mm HP5 in the camera and decided to take a few pics of a whiffleball player in my back yard (not my kid, but he's a handsome buck). I had already exposed half of the roll at iso400 and it was really bright outside, so I wasn't expecting great results on a cloudless day at 1PM.

    I quickly finished the roll and remembered the advice from "way beyond monochrome" about exposing film, and decided to give it a try. So I grabbed a roll of FP4 and set the iso to 80. I developed the HP5 normally and developed the FP4 at normal time minus 15%.

    I used Xtol stock for each roll of film, and wet printed on Ilford MGIV with no dodging or burning. The contrast filter and exposure settings on the enlarger were the same for each print. This paper has a little tooth to it so some of the sharpness is lost on these scans, but on the prints things look sharp where they should.

    The results are below:






    They both look decent on paper but I bet you can tell which is which. It was a fun experiment.

    Jeff

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    North America just north of that sharp right turn North America makes on the Atlantic coast.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    602
    I'm going to say that the top one was shot at ISO 400, and the bottom at ISO 80 this guess is based on the depth of field of the photos. I have to admit, that is the only clue for me as to what speed these were shot at.
    "Would you like it if someone that painted in oils told you that you were not making portraits because you were using a camera?"
    "Shouldn't it be more about the joy of producing and viewing the photo than what you paid for the camera?"

    Me

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    69
    Images
    13
    That's quite right, fp4/iso 80 is the bottom. The slower film did allow a larger aperture as you say, but also the 400 speed image has no information that I can find in the darker shadows - it's just black. The slower film seems to have detail everywhere. The difference is more subtle than I was expecting, but it's there.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin