Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,592   Posts: 1,546,081   Online: 920
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Max Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Aylmer, QC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    598
    Images
    5

    Question about Ilford MG RC and Filters

    I have a fairly simple question for you all. I did go to the Ilford tech site, but found nothing which answers my question.

    A couple of months ago, after many years out of the darkroom, I managed to set up my own and have been developing and printing and having a great deal of fun at it. I am no professional, so I use Ilford MG RC and filters; it just makes sense for me. Yesterday, I was looking at articles on darkroom work, and I came across one that stated that with Ilford MG papers, one 'ought' to always start with the number two filter and work up and down from there depending upon the result one desires. What struck me as odd is that I don't usually use filters at all! I have found that enlarging directly onto MG paper, without filters, gives me some very 'balanced' and pleasing results that seem to be quite faithful to the negatives used.

    Is this 'normal'? To what grade of filter does unfiltered MG paper correspond?
    Max Power, he's the man who's name you'd love to touch! But you mustn't touch! His name sounds good in your ear, but when you say it, you mustn't fear! 'Cause his name can be said by anyone!

  2. #2
    Dave Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Middle England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,894
    Images
    2
    About 2.5 I think that you are missing a lot of the fun of using variable contrast paper if you don't exploit it's properties.
    Regards Dave.

    An English Eye


  3. #3
    David Ruby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    203
    Images
    6
    I've always started at grade 2 (with Kodak filters) as I thought this this was basically the filter for normal contrast. Then, I go up or down from there. Starting with 2 helps me determine if the neg is high or low contrast. I'm now printing with Ilford MG fiber, and still using the Kokak filters. So far I haven't noticed any major differences.

  4. #4
    rogueish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    3rd Rock
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    877
    I have read in several books and been told by 3 differnt instructors tha tunfiltered multi-contrasr paper is equal to a #2 filter. From what I could see, this is not always true. A number 2 filter is middle of the road and repersents and good starting point.
    One of the lessons for class was to do a test strip under a #2 filter to find the best (in your opinion) time for a said enlargement. Then using that time, print the enlargement once for each filter and once without. Make sure you write the filter no. on the back of each print, then compare them. I could see a definite difference between a #2 and non filtered. I also learned that I prefer higher contrast to middle of the road.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Louisiana, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,325
    I think I read somewhere that unfiltered MGIV is the same as the 2 1/2 filter.

    There is no "normal", really. If your negatives print well on unfiltered MG and you get the kind of print you want, that's all that counts. For about 25 of my 30 years in photography, I printed on graded paper only and my negatives almost always printed best on a grade 3 Agfa Portriga Rapid. Since I've been using VC papers, I've found using multiple filters is more flexible.

  6. #6
    Max Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Aylmer, QC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    598
    Images
    5
    Thanks, everyone for your help...I really appreciate it.

    Rogueish, last night I was thinking of doing the experiment you describe. Good idea. I can then keep them to the side for ready reference as need be.

    Thanks again everyone,

    Kent
    Max Power, he's the man who's name you'd love to touch! But you mustn't touch! His name sounds good in your ear, but when you say it, you mustn't fear! 'Cause his name can be said by anyone!



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin