Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,946   Posts: 1,194,825   Online: 628
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Shooter
    35mm Pan
    Posts
    43

    Need some help with 1950s films

    So, I'm going to test a Bolsey B2 camera that my dad has at home and I'm trying to pick a film accordingly, something that has a lower ISO as I don't know if that camera can handle today film speeds.

    The list has
    -Super XX
    -Supreme
    -Plus-X
    -Pan-X
    -Ultraspeed Pan

    -I take it that Pan-X is Panatomic-X (ISO 32??). Is Pan-X really short for Panatomic? or was there something called Pan-X? Plus-X, has it always been rated for ISO125? Or was it rated to something lower back then, because everything else seems to be very low (like Kodachrome Dayl't and Type A). What about Super-XX? Does anyone know that or something about the other films, called Supreme and Ultraspeed Pan?

    It seems like I can get films from Adox, Efke and Rollei in ISO 25-32 and 50, and Ilford in 50, so that might be what I buy
    Last edited by N467RX; 06-16-2011 at 10:47 PM.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,674
    Grabbing my trusty 1950 era PLI handbook, I find:

    Kodak Super XX ASA 100 daylight, 64 tungsten
    Ansco Supreme ASA 50 daylight, 32 tungsten
    Kodak Plus X ASA 50 daylight, 32 tungsten
    Kodak Panatomic X ASA 25 daylight, 16 tungsten
    Ansco Ultra Speed Pan ASA 100 daylight 64 tungsten

  3. #3
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,006
    Images
    4
    Super XX would be the fastest Kodak film of the bunch that you listed, I think – probably ASA 100 speed. Ultraspeed Pan is probably the same speed, maybe ASA 200 speed max. I'm not sure.

    You should be able to do fine with anything 100 speed or below.

    Pan-X is short for Panatomic X.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  4. #4
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,116
    I'm not sure the Plus X and Pan X were really slower then than later. Back then the tended to under rate speeds on neg film to ensure enough exposure with simple cameras and meters. Later on film speeds became much more realistic.

  5. #5
    Whiteymorange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boston area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,770
    Images
    23
    Just shoot any of the 100 speed films out there- or Plus X, which I rate at 100 as well. These seem to work pretty well in all my simple old cameras.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    17
    To me, I don't think you need to worry about film being too fast- overexposure should be fine as long as you develop accordingly. Any of the 100 speed films should have enough latitude to handle a few stops of overexposure, although the 50 speed films will work fine too. I suppose you could always just use a ND filter to compensate.

  7. #7
    PDH
    PDH is offline

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    148
    Efke films use the old Adox and Dupont formulas from the 50s, the ISO 100 and 50 films should give a 50 look. I think you still get Efke film from Freestyle Film Company.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    399
    Images
    9
    T-Max 400 gives me room to use a red filter on my old Zeiss. I think your B2 will take a Series V filter adaptor.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Shooter
    35mm Pan
    Posts
    43
    Well, I ended up buying a roll of Adox 25 and two of Efke 50, I figure the looks will be appropriate. I'm not getting filters or anything, as of right now, I don't know if the camera works properly and I still gotta figure out how to use it. I tested the shutter back in December and it worked, but that's all I know that works, and the tab that secures the back to the camera needs a bit of adjustement/cleaning. So we'll see.

  10. #10
    cmacd123's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Stittsville, Ontario
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    621
    REmember that the ASA speeds doubled when the spec was redefined, for example old 200 ASA became 400ASA. (the film speed did not change.) so set it for Plus-x and feel free to use modern 100ISO film.
    Charles MacDonald
    aa508@ncf.ca
    I still live just beyond the fringe in Stittsville

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin