Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,515   Posts: 1,572,080   Online: 1164
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Stephen J. Collier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    163
    Images
    15

    Clayton Chemicals

    Has any one here ever used Clayton's F76 Plus film developer on Tri-X? Has any one used any of their products(stop bath, fixer, print developer)? What was your experience; how did you like or dislike the chemicals?
    [COLOR=DarkOliveGreen][SIZE=2]"We are not at War, we are having a nervous breakdown". Hunter S. Thompson[/SIZE][/COLOR]

  2. #2
    papagene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Western Mass., USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,199
    Images
    118
    I used the F76 Plus on HP5+ with good results. Also tried their fix and paper developer. The fix seems to be as good as the Ilford MG Rapid Fix and the paper developer produced clean whites and rich blacks.
    I think they are as good as the commercial chemicals from the larger companies. I don't think they are the magic elixirs some are looking for, just good quality products.

    gene
    gene LaFord


    Long live Ed "Big Daddy" Roth!!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    "I don't care about Milwaukee or Chicago." - Yvon LeBlanc

  3. #3
    Stephen J. Collier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    163
    Images
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by papagene
    I used the F76 Plus on HP5+ with good results. Also tried their fix and paper developer. The fix seems to be as good as the Ilford MG Rapid Fix and the paper developer produced clean whites and rich blacks.
    I think they are as good as the commercial chemicals from the larger companies. I don't think they are the magic elixirs some are looking for, just good quality products.

    gene

    Thank You!
    [COLOR=DarkOliveGreen][SIZE=2]"We are not at War, we are having a nervous breakdown". Hunter S. Thompson[/SIZE][/COLOR]

  4. #4
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,435
    Images
    20
    I looked into their products once, particularly because they offer an odorless fixer (I gather the US Navy is a big client, so I can imagine the attraction), but I think the shipping cost may have made it unattractive.

    Lowell Huff of Clayton Chemicals posts occasionally on photo.net--

    http://www.photo.net/shared/communit...user_id=557681
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  5. #5
    titrisol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,671
    Images
    8
    Times/temp data is hard to find for these chemicals. Anyone mind sharing their experiences?
    I'm planning on replacing DDX with F76+ and would like to know if anyone has given Delta3200 or Neopan 400 a shot in this chemistry.

    How are the times/dilutions of F76 compared to DDX?
    Mama took my APX away.....

  6. #6
    eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,586
    Images
    55
    I haven't use anything except their oderless fixer. I had a question about it once and I called the support number. I talked to Lowell and he is a great guy to talk to on the phone. He know's his stuff. He's a chemist. He'll be glad to talk to you if you call him.

  7. #7
    Eric Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    124
    Images
    16
    Here are my times for the following:

    Fuji Acros
    Clayton F76+ @68?f 1+19
    Constant Tube Agitation
    Paper Grade 2 ES: 1.05 log

    N-4 : 5 1/4 minutes EI: 32
    N-3 : 6 1/4 minutes EI: 32
    N-2 : 7 minutes EI: 40
    N-1 : 8 1/2 minutes EI: 40
    N : 10 minutes EI: 50
    N +1 : 12 3/4 minutes EI: 64
    N+2 : 17 minutes EI: 64

  8. #8
    titrisol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,671
    Images
    8
    I liked what I saw with Efke 100
    I developed Efke 100 (35mm) in F76+ 1+9 for 14 minutes
    agitating once every minute and a half (sometimes 2 minutes)

    Haven;t printed yet, but negatives look very nicely graded, and contrasty enough.
    Last edited by titrisol; 03-15-2005 at 04:38 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: typo!
    Mama took my APX away.....



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin