Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,222   Posts: 1,532,444   Online: 1162
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    timlayton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    51

    HP5 Plus Large Format Sheet Film in PMK Pyro?

    I am starting a new journey of testing large format HP5 Plus sheet film in PMK Pyro. I am using PMK Pyro because I am making Pt/Pd contact prints. I welcome any comments, tips, advice, lessons learned, etc. from HP5 Plus LF sheet film users with PMK Pyro.


    Thanks

    Tim

  2. #2
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,169
    Since trial and error will be more expensive and time consuming than printing with silver based paper, I'd probably avoid a staining developer with UV printing. There is no easy way to determine the negative density to UV light.

    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/9...e-problem.html

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    228
    When I was using PMK, in an open tray with constant agitation, i.e. shuffling film, my time for HP5+ was: EI 400 PMK Pyro 1:2:100@20C, 14:00 minutes, for Pt/Pd printing.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    228
    I forgot, do not put the negative back in the spent developer after fixing.

    I used rapid fix, contrary to conventional wisdom, without problems.

  5. #5
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,780
    Quote Originally Posted by FredW View Post
    I forgot, do not put the negative back in the spent developer after fixing.

    I used rapid fix, contrary to conventional wisdom, without problems.
    Yes, skip the after bath, it only builds base+fog. Hutchings agrees. I use TF4. When I have used acid I have had some pinholes with some old style emulsions. In regard to calibrating density, since you will be calibrating your PMK negative to a specific emulsion(pt/pd), once you have arrived, you have arrived. It doesn't matter what developer you use, unless you change it. The blue channel on my densitometer gives consistent numbers. They don't actually mean anything though, outside what they mean as to how they print with my integrator. But as I said, once you've arrived, you arrived. Basically if you have a PMK neg that prints well with silver it will print well with alt process with little adjustment. That's what is so cool about them. I have been very satisfied with PMK specifically for pt/pd.
    None of my PMK negatives have had any problems, but then again I don't leave them lying out in the sun.
    Last edited by JBrunner; 12-15-2011 at 06:31 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #6
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,304
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    434
    Actually, one of the beauties of so many alt processes is that once you have the negative dialed in, there is no more trial and error, no more burning and dodging, so even with pt/pd, the cost per finished print goes way down. I'm pretty much at the 1st print is a good print point, sometimes I have to make a second print. Pyro-based developers are IDEAL for alt-process printing, especially if you get down the garden path a way and start doing salt prints or albumen prints, which need a really contrasty/beefy negative. Pt/Pd likes a somewhat beefier negative than silver - expose the same, then add maybe 20% to your developing time over what you'd need for silver and you're good to go. Cyanotypes need a negative with a compressed density range - over-expose by say 2 stops, then pull the development 20% to compensate so you have shadow detail without blown-out highlights.

    PMK is a good pyro developer, but it is a speed-losing developer. You'll definitely need to add a stop to retain detail in your shadows with it. Look into Pyrocat HD or MC instead - you can expose at normal ASA. Get the MC if you're tray processing, as it will oxidize a little slower than the HD version and will be less likely to exhaust during an extended development session. No matter which version (PMK, Pyrocat, etc), use them 1-shot, do not try to replenish or re-use.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    NW Chicagoland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    558
    Images
    1
    If you are using rotary processing PMK may not be the best choice. It can oxidize fast. There are several workarounds. One is to split the developer and change it halfway through the development time. Lot's of info on the problem so make sure you research it if using rotary.

  8. #8
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,828
    Blog Entries
    1
    HP5+ as well as other films of this speed do not expand as well as slower films. This causes some problem with getting sufficient D-Max to print well with Pt/Pd. It can be done, but often results in the whole scale moving up the curve and long printing times with insufficient contrast.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Films NOT Dead - Just getting fixed![/FONT]



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin