New Policy: Leaving APUG 'Grand Exit' Announcements - Banned

[David Brown]

Surely I'm not the only one who sees the irony that this thread about no more certain threads is up to 13 pages. :o

We have got to get lives, people!

[naturephoto1]

Surely I'm not the only one who sees the irony that this thread about no more certain threads is up to 13 pages. :o

We have got to get lives, people!

Gee I don't know David, is there life outside of APUG??? :o :rolleyes:

Rich

[jd callow]

Well I figure photo.net probably delete quite a lot of content daily, it's in their terms of use:

"We reserve the right to delete anything that has been uploaded to the site. A sufficient reason for a moderator to delete a posting is "didn't think it was interesting." A moderator may be replaced, but never second-guessed or argued with."

Sean,
With on slight change can we have the samething:

A sufficient reason for a moderator to delete a posting is "didn't think it was interesting." A moderator will never be replaced, and never second-guessed or argued with.

[Dave Parker]

Sean,
With on slight change can we have the samething:

A sufficient reason for a moderator to delete a posting is "didn't think it was interesting." A moderator will never be replaced, and never second-guessed or argued with.

There ya go, Democracy in action! Kind of goes along the lines of why the reason I deleted my messages last night and "Someone" changed my reason......?

I have come to the conclusion, it is like arguing with a Police Officer, you may be right, but your never going to win..

:o

[Sean]

Since when are private websites a democracy?

[Dave Parker]

Since when are private websites a democracy?

There not...

[Ole]

Sean,
With on slight change can we have the samething:

A sufficient reason for a moderator to delete a posting is "didn't think it was interesting." A moderator will never be replaced, and never second-guessed or argued with.

"Didn't think it was interesting" isn't good enough reason for me. If it's completely out of line - either totally off topic, redundant posting #138, or "liable to cause a riot", I'll delete.

If I can remove the "inflammatory content" without changing the information content, I prefer that.

"Never second-guessed or argued with"? We're second-guessed and argued with all the time. But since we're the moderators, we never lose an argument! So it's a waste of time.

[Photo Engineer]

Hasn't this gone on long enough. If it is not a democracy, then lock the thread. It is getting tiresome.

PE

[Sean]

Hasn't this gone on long enough. If it is not a democracy, then lock the thread. It is getting tiresome.

PE

Sounds good to me..