|
|
|
-
 Originally Posted by Krzys
Sorry, what is a RFH?
RFH= Roll Film Holder
-
I have a Pentax 6x7 which I love, it's also my fave medium format camera. Definitely get one, they're quite affordable these days as well.
-
Just to keep things open I will consider a Mamiya RB67 with 90mm lens and a 150mm or 180mm. A prism and some filters would also be good. I don't care for extra backs, one is fine as I have no need for swapping film types.
-
 Originally Posted by Krzys
Sorry, what is a RFH?
RFH=Roll Film Holder
-
Got an RB with a 90, a 127, and a 180 that I am thinking about selling. Also have a 250 with a busted diaphragm that can be shot, but will likely underexpose a tad due to one lame aperture blade that closes down a bit more than the rest.
What kind of Wista do you have? You have pix?
I know you think the RB is unwieldy, or whatever you think, but it is really a superior system to the Pentax 67 in nearly every way. Unless you are just stuck on the fact that the P-67 looks like a big 35mm, or need super critical film plane flatness (which you do not, for 99% of what most people shoot), the RB is the way to go, given the market for both systems at this time. The P-67 really does not handle any better IMHO, and they are also more expensive. I like them a lot, mind you, and would love to have a system, but there are many advantages to an RB for what most people shoot.
The main point, however, is that the P-67 really doesn't handle any easier to me. I would not agree that it is the better hand held camera.
Not trying to sell ya...just talkin'.
Last edited by 2F/2F; 02-28-2010 at 09:34 PM. Click to view previous post history.
2F/2F
"Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."
- Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
I have a very clean Pentax 6x7, with mirror lock up. Far from new, but lightly used (mostly on a copy stand.) 90mm 2.8 leaf shutter lens; 150 2.8. 135 4.0 macro. Focussing extension tubes, reverse adapters, M42 adapter; wooden grip, prism finder (no meter), wlf,
John, Mount Vernon, Virginia USA
-
Thanks for the offers, I have sent you both PMs.
-
 Originally Posted by Krzys
Sorry, what is a RFH?
Roll Film Holder
-
Yes, for the third time.....whats worse is that I realized what it meant 10 minutes after I made the post, while walking onto the bus.
-
 Originally Posted by 2F/2F
Got an RB with a 90, a 127, and a 180 that I am thinking about selling. Also have a 250 with a busted diaphragm that can be shot, but will likely underexpose a tad due to one lame aperture blade that closes down a bit more than the rest.
What kind of Wista do you have? You have pix?
I know you think the RB is unwieldy, or whatever you think, but it is really a superior system to the Pentax 67 in nearly every way. Unless you are just stuck on the fact that the P-67 looks like a big 35mm, or need super critical film plane flatness (which you do not, for 99% of what most people shoot), the RB is the way to go, given the market for both systems at this time. The P-67 really does not handle any better IMHO, and they are also more expensive. I like them a lot, mind you, and would love to have a system, but there are many advantages to an RB for what most people shoot.
The main point, however, is that the P-67 really doesn't handle any easier to me. I would not agree that it is the better hand held camera.
Not trying to sell ya...just talkin'.
I had an RB67 for a bit, loved it, loved the lenses, will probably get another at some point in the future, but at the moment, I'm too much of a poor student to afford two 6x7 systems and I find the P67 to be more portable and a far faster solution for the sort of street work I like to do. Were I a landscape man or a studio shooter, I'd have held onto the RB.
|
|