Originally Posted by Simon R Galley
We can and do scale our business, it works just fine.
...we run a business and remain robustly profitable.
And there you have it. It works just fine. They are robustly profitable.
It's NOT an impossible outcome.
[Edit: But it may be an Impossible outcome...]
Last edited by Ken Nadvornick; 02-21-2012 at 04:43 PM. Click to view previous post history.
Reason: Added [Edit]...
"They are the proof that something was there and no longer is. Like a stain. And the stillness of them is boggling. You can turn away but when you come back they’ll still be there looking at you."
— Diane Arbus, March 15, 1971, in response to a request for a brief statement about photographs
We just left 6 rolls of film off for processing. It was going to take 2 hours due to the heavy load today, so we left them to pick up tomorrow. See. We are doing our part.
Please start making colour neg.
Originally Posted by Photo Engineer
See. We are doing our part.
Yes, a nice, natural toned C-41 color negative film from Ilford would be sweet.
That being said, Portra is awesome.
Stop worrying about grain, resolution, sharpness, and everything else that doesn't have a damn thing to do with substance.
While I'd like alternatives in color Ilford is a small niche company making great products in their niche. I'd much rather they keep doing that than engage in a risky high capital new line.
Now if they could get the rights to Ilfochrome from "the other Ilford" and make that...
I'll settle for XP2 Super in 4x5!
My Flickr Page
Yes, LF chromogenic b&w please. Trust me it'll be a big splash with our hybrid brethren.
"Only dead fish follow the stream"
[APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]
R&D in color is very very expensive! Synthesis of the color chemistry is very very expensive. Well, you get the picture. I don't want to have Ilford lose out by a big R&D project. Be realistic in this people.
I personally don't want Ilford to make color. I want Kodak and Fuji to continue!