Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,694   Posts: 1,482,498   Online: 1033
      
Page 10 of 30 FirstFirst ... 4567891011121314151620 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 292
  1. #91

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by jeff.blackwell View Post
    Dave -
    I don't know who you use for E6 processing, but I've been satisfied with Colourworks in Wilmington.
    I can second that. I was in there earlier this week, and they are still running E-6 3 days per week. They do a nice job. They told me that they are getting film from up and down the East Coast. Even as E-6 tapers off, I expect that there will be a few labs out there. It just may become a mail business, rather than a drop off business. We lost one major E-6 lab in Wilmington a few years back, and Colourworks is the last lab standing here.

  2. #92
    jp498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Owls Head ME
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,345
    Images
    69
    Back in the day (1990's) I'd use slide film when I wanted color images the lab wouldn't butcher through their automated printing like they do with c41. slides were very wysiwyg as long as they were exposed properly. It was never consumer friendly. I bet most slide film in the 1990's was bought by serious photographers who wanted results rather than travelers wanting to make slideshows. I didn't have any problem acquiring used projectors and slide trays cheaply in the 1990s, so it was a weak market then for the casual consumer.

    Digital provides this wysiwyg experience, right down to proper exposure. And there's no turn around time.

    Now that scanning is probably the most common "next step" in the work flow, computers can handle negatives almost as easily as positives. Slides were never printed super literal anyways. They look good as is, but would usually end up a little different with the contrast of a cibachrome or the changes from an internegative, or the changes from the computer scanning. They mostly never got to be appreciated as a unique high quality original image.

  3. #93

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,288
    Champion may be marketing chemicals under more than one label, and if Kodak cannot keep up its end of the relationship, they can go it alone. But they no doubt benefit from the recognizable Kodak label as well as the Kodak distribution system. I'd imagine they'll try to work things out rather than run up the white flage to Fuji-Hunt in the significant RA4 category. But I'm more concerned about specialty developers like HC-110 and TMRS.
    These aren't easy to duplicate in the specifics. Sometimes similar is not similar enough. I really don't know how
    diversified Champion is, and hope they don't have to get restructured also due to a domino effect. Let's just say,
    I stockpiled some extra developer too!

  4. #94

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,288
    Slides were in fact a big deal, and pro photographers sometimes staked both their reputations and their fees on winning pro-level slide shows. And shooting them wouldn't let you be sloppy with exp
    like digital and amateur neg film did. An ole time slide show still looks a lot more impressive than a
    computr screen image, esp with the right subject matter. Shooting chromes for printing per se is
    a more advanced skill. But technology doesn't always improve things. Perhaps the best color shows
    ever were back when three lantern projectors were aligned side by side with tricolor black and white
    sheet film images in them.

  5. #95

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Aristophanes View Post
    The other brands are under the same pressure of declining demand.

    It's an industry-wide problem. From Fuji's perspective this may not be a good thing because they are now seen as the sole source for tying their brand to the E6 product in constant demand decline. If they cannot find enough customers, then Fuji will get the "killed it" tag.

    Kodak cannot afford to invest in fickle customers. It has a fiscal duty to its shareholders (now creditors) and it often makes sense in business to walk away from products and customers that do not serve the bottom line.

    Both Kodak and Fuji appear to be helpless in stemming the drop in film demand. That's why I hope some Hollywood connected private equity will pick up the market and consolidate.
    When I said that, given Kodak's untruths and lack of customer interest, consumers would turn to other brands, I was thinking of remaining products with "Kodak" branding, not just film.

    Kodak is now seen as a failed company....if there was no more film and I had to to go digital, and Kodak brought out the finest and most advanced digital camera system in the world, I wouldn't buy it. I'd see Nikon, Leica, etc., as the way to go...more chance that they'll still be around, and the gear wouldn't go the way of APS, disc, 126, and all the other Kodak mistakes. What retailer would want to try to sell "Kodak" products right now, not even their Chinese-made batteries!

  6. #96

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    605
    Sadly when slide film is gone, my presentations will probably largely go d*****l. Notice I didn't say capture... I've scanned some negatives I shot last spring and the detail in them is quite good, even when viewed on a computer screen. Guess I'll have to start saving up a few bucks for that other kind of projector that really stinks.
    ME Super

    Shoot more film.
    There are eight ways to put a slide into a projector tray. Seven of them are wrong.

  7. #97

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,740
    Quote Originally Posted by ME Super View Post
    Sadly when slide film is gone, my presentations will probably largely go d*****l. Notice I didn't say capture... I've scanned some negatives I shot last spring and the detail in them is quite good, even when viewed on a computer screen. Guess I'll have to start saving up a few bucks for that other kind of projector that really stinks.
    Don't be sad, be smart and prepare, try to come up with plans that lay out what you need to do in 5 year blocks, that is what I did with Kodachrome and it payed off, I shot over 35,000 Kodachromes in a span of less than 5 years, no crying, no regrets, just amazing images...

  8. #98

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,740
    By the way, in looking for a rare enlarging lens, I was talking to the owner of a very good lab in the state where I live about E6, he literally just wrote back one minute ago and said the following:

    "Right now E-6 is doing very well. We process for other labs around the country so our daily runs are fairly consistent. As long as we can buy juice and Refrema parts we'll keep on with it. We use Fuji chemistry."

  9. #99
    Ken Nadvornick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,801
    Images
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by PKM-25 View Post
    "Right now E-6 is doing very well..."
    And I'm certain there are a couple of posters around here itching to tell him he doesn't have a clue as to what he's talking about...

    Ken
    "Hate is an adolescent term used to stop discussion with people you disagree with. You can do better than that."
    —'blanksy', December 13, 2013

  10. #100
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798
    "We use Fuji chemistry."

    Several lab owners here in Toronto have mentioned that Fujifilm.ca reps aren't optimistic about Fuji's commitment to photo chemistry. Whether it's true or just a shill for new equipment--who knows?



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin