Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,880   Posts: 1,520,492   Online: 812
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    zsas's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,959
    Images
    74

    Kodak Film Div - Only profitable segment of company in 2011

    Since Kodak is in the midst of a chapter 11, they don't make quarterly/annual filings like non-ch 11 publicly traded corporations, but it looks like some info re their 2011 annual results has been filed (I assume with the court). Prior to this the last rpt we have seen was the 3Q11 rot.

    See this tidbit from a newly filed annual rpt:

    "The only part of Kodak to post a profit was its Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group, where profits fell by 63% to $34*million, on sales down 12% at $1.5 billion."

    Per:
    http://www.proprint.com.au/News/2947...hapter-11.aspx

    Sure it isn't roses but it's not what the trolls and other haters would leave you to believe....
    Andy

  2. #2
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,912
    Images
    65
    Explain this to Aristophanse! He disagrees totally with this.

    PE

  3. #3
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,050
    Images
    60
    Oof - $34 million on falling sales of $1.5 billion - that isn't much for a company the size of Kodak, especially with the debts of Kodak.

    The other Kodak related articles linked to on that referenced site are interesting, in that they tend to show how little of the "new" Kodak is related to film or things like home computer printers.

    And the part of the article that discusses the unsecured trade creditors is scary too - as much as I worry about the employees, I think it is at least as tragic what this might do to the unsecured trade creditors.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    29
    LOL Photo Engineer! If there was a +1/Thumbs up option for your post, I'd do it!
    Typical digital zombies say: "Adapt or die!" "The world is changing, change with it!" "Analog is old and nasty! EEEEEEEWWWWWW!" "Why should I pay money for getting my pictures when I can have everything NOW?" "Why shoot manual when you can have the camera do everything automatically?"

    Primary 35mm camera - Pentax K1000
    Secondary 35mm camera - Mamiya/Sekor 1000 DTL - M42 Mount
    Medium Format: Mamiya RB67

  5. #5
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    Explain this to Aristophanse! He disagrees totally with this.

    PE
    LOL don't even bother! haven't we had enough of those threads... Sometimes you just have to take what you know and put it to good use and let forum experts amuse themselves.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  6. #6
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,798
    Quote Originally Posted by zsas View Post
    Since Kodak is in the midst of a chapter 11, they don't make quarterly/annual filings like non-ch 11 publicly traded corporations, but it looks like some info re their 2011 annual results has been filed (I assume with the court). Prior to this the last rpt we have seen was the 3Q11 rot.

    See this tidbit from a newly filed annual rpt:

    "The only part of Kodak to post a profit was its Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group, where profits fell by 63% to $34*million, on sales down 12% at $1.5 billion."

    Per:
    http://www.proprint.com.au/News/2947...hapter-11.aspx

    Sure it isn't roses but it's not what the trolls and other haters would leave you to believe....
    Please post to YouTube the video of your reaction to some truly good news.

    Your dearly departed "troll and hater" Aristophanes was a least numerate and could read a financial statement--much to the consternation of the resident fabulists.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,429
    Do they say how much of the film revenue was siphoned off to feed losing units? That might explain some of the -63%

    Very encouraging that "Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group" sales were off only 12%.
    - Bill Lynch

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    46
    Well, I guess it's time to cue up the tape...

    "Film is dead. What market? Have you seen the demand curve? The war on the car is over. Stop the gravy train. Respect for taxpayers."

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by zsas View Post
    Since Kodak is in the midst of a chapter 11, they don't make quarterly/annual filings like non-ch 11 publicly traded corporations, but it looks like some info re their 2011 annual results has been filed (I assume with the court). Prior to this the last rpt we have seen was the 3Q11 rot.

    See this tidbit from a newly filed annual rpt:

    "The only part of Kodak to post a profit was its Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group, where profits fell by 63% to $34*million, on sales down 12% at $1.5 billion."

    Per:
    http://www.proprint.com.au/News/2947...hapter-11.aspx

    Sure it isn't roses but it's not what the trolls and other haters would leave you to believe....

    I was surprised to see this since I thought that Kodak did not report profits for individual business units. However, I had seen these numbers before but with slightly different explanation -- they come from the SEC 10-K filing that Kodak made for 2011 financials and can be found on the Kodak website under Financial Information/SEC filings. In that document (p. 33), the so-called $34M profit is defined as Earnings from Continuing Operations before Interest Expense, Other Income(Charges), Net and Income Taxes for the Film, Photofinishing, and Entertainment Group Segment (FPEG) . I'm not a financial expert but that doesn't quite sound the same as profits. The same information is also shown for the other two reportable group segments, both of which had a loss. On p. 54, there is a Consolidated Statement of Operations that shows a gross profit of $887M (defined as total net sales minus cost of sales). However, the bottom line (after all the other adjustments are made) is that there was a net loss for the year of $764M. Again, not being a financial expert, I read that to mean the entire company had gross profit of $887M offset by $1651M for a bottom line of negative $764M. There is interest here to speculate if FPEG, or some subset, could survive financially as a stand-alone. I guess it all depends on how much the stand-alone would have in offsets compared to the $34M of gross profits.

    In the interest of full disclosure, I am a 2005 retiree of Kodak having spent 36 years in Paper Manufacturing (Paper Mfg does not exist today but remnants of it are in the Photofinishing part of FPEG.

  10. #10
    kb3lms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Reading, PA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    689
    Images
    5
    I sure do hope FPEG is turning a profit. Even at lower run-rates you would think they would.

    You need to apply critical thinking when reading all this financial information. I'm certainly no financial expert, either. For those who worked at Kodak and I guess others,too, there were all those financial reports with gross earnings of some very high number but then there were always the "one-time charges," "cost due to restructuring" and my all time favorite "write down of unamortized goodwill," whatever the hell that is or was. In the end they would take a gross profit and then lose money. Anyway, it seems like financial reports can be made to say anything you want them to say, depending on what spin you want to put on the data.

    old accountant joke: three accountants interview for a position. Each accountant is asked the question: "What is two plus two?"
    1st accoutant responds: "four"
    2nd accountant responds: "twenty-two"
    3rd accountant gets up from his chair and closes the door and the blinds on the window then responds: "What do you want it to be?"

    Who do you think gets the job?

    I think financial reports are like that.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin