Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,829   Posts: 1,582,226   Online: 1033
      
Page 44 of 48 FirstFirst ... 343839404142434445464748 LastLast
Results 431 to 440 of 477

Thread: Fotokemika ...

  1. #431
    Brac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    628
    Quote Originally Posted by darkroom_rookie View Post
    Looking at the state of the machinery as displayed in the article's photograph, with its apparently peeling paintwork, it becomes understandable why production stopped. It also perhaps explains why in recent years there were so many problems with quality control. The closure is still a great shame and means a reduction in choice for photographers.

  2. #432
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,041
    Aside of being behind in corrosion protecting at machinery, to be seen already at photos published in the past, failure of workplace climate control, also stated by an other source, the article reports a collapsing roof and flooding.

    Out of the industry you hear that this all is due to being captured in being forced to large scale production at minimal profit. However as there are several parties involved in dealing with Fotokemika all those comments out of that field should be taken with a grain of salt. I find it hard with a desktop perspective to reason on the cause of Fotokemika's demise as manufacturer.
    Last edited by AgX; 01-02-2013 at 10:12 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #433

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,490
    Sad to lose them.
    - Bill Lynch

  4. #434

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by Brac View Post
    Looking at the state of the machinery as displayed in the article's photograph, with its apparently peeling paintwork, it becomes understandable why production stopped. It also perhaps explains why in recent years there were so many problems with quality control.
    You might find further two pictures from the complete article even more telling:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fotokemika1.jpg 
Views:	97 
Size:	934.6 KB 
ID:	62370 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fotokemika2.jpg 
Views:	100 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	62369

    Note to administrator: if there are potential copyright issues with these newspaper scans, please do remove this post immediately.

  5. #435
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,200
    Wow - like tap dancing elephants (the amazing thing isn't that they do it well but that they do it at all) there was a lot of criticism of quality issues with Efke films but overall they seemed pretty decent. Not up to Kodak/Ilford/Fuji or even Foma but considering the equipment the amazing thing was that they were as good as they were. They were obviously doing a great job given what they had to work with.

  6. #436

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,490
    But it shows you don't need a billion-dollar facility to make film.
    - Bill Lynch

  7. #437
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,530
    Images
    65
    You do if you want good film with high quality.

    Compare Kodak, Ilford and Fuji with these products.

    PE

  8. #438
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,200
    No doubt Kodak, Ilford and Fuji were and are far more consistent. But Efke was usable most of the time. Considering they were apparently working with "stone knives and bearskins" to quote Mr. Spock, they did pretty darned well.

    (City on the Edge of Forever: "I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.")

  9. #439
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,530
    Images
    65
    And Roger you are right. However, there are far more complaints about EFKE products here than for products from the big 3. I have seen defects that others have missed AAMOF. I have some samples here that I posted and I got no comment.

    You see, one of the defects is uneven coating speed. This causes a sinusoidal coating pattern giving products high and low density in a given pattern. You would see it very badly in LF, but hardly at all in 35mm. Another unremarked problem is particles of dirt and dust in the coated film. So, they do well as IMHO most here ignore or are not aware of these "tiny" problems.

    PE

  10. #440

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,490
    And when Kodak and Fuji abandon us then even a Fotokemika would be wonderful to have.
    - Bill Lynch



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin