Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,696   Posts: 1,669,662   Online: 1045
      
Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 93
  1. #71

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,546
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    ...I can cite about a dozen such projects which as an aggregate run up a tab of several hundred million...

    ...The point is that EK, like many other companies, had a lot of internal and unknown things going on. Some were good and some fell flat!

    PE
    Right on!

    I can say from my observations as a consultant who has worked deep inside over 30 major US corporations that MOST managerial decisions are not made in the best interest of the company, but for a myriad of personal/egotistical reasons.

    The worst driver is supposed "cost savings". Seldom properly measured or proven. Just put the number you need it to be on a spreadsheet or power point presentation.

    Most management gets rewarded for things other than the best interest of the company.

    Promotions, bonuses, assignments, prime office space... it goes to the BS'ers and self-promoters who never, ever consider the benefit of the company in their decisions.
    - Bill Lynch

  2. #72
    Hatchetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    989
    Images
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by wblynch View Post
    Most management gets rewarded for things other than the best interest of the company.

    Promotions, bonuses, assignments, prime office space... it goes to the BS'ers and self-promoters who never, ever consider the benefit of the company in their decisions.
    I agree with this. Basically poor management from the top down. Incentives in publicly traded companies are geared toward short-term stock performance. Kodak had a lot going for it: a lot of cash, a great name, smart people. Yes, their core business was eroding but they had plenty of time (15-20 years?) to adapt. Instead they risked it all on digital printing, an industry already loaded with stiff competition. That has to be one of the dumbest ideas ever. It will be probably be talked about in MBA seminars for the next century!

  3. #73
    SilverGlow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Orange County, Calif
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    739
    Images
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by Hatchetman View Post
    I agree with this. Basically poor management from the top down. Incentives in publicly traded companies are geared toward short-term stock performance. Kodak had a lot going for it: a lot of cash, a great name, smart people. Yes, their core business was eroding but they had plenty of time (15-20 years?) to adapt. Instead they risked it all on digital printing, an industry already loaded with stiff competition. That has to be one of the dumbest ideas ever. It will be probably be talked about in MBA seminars for the next century!
    Yup, 15-20 years to adapt. And riddle me this: How did they go from inventing the digital camera, and feeding Canon and Nikon high-end state of the art full frame sensors to where they're at today? Surely one does not have to be an alumni or insider to come up with reasons. Is there any other short answer then this: Upper and perhapd middle management were fat rich idiots?!? I've consulted too, with 100+ companies and the one common denominator I often see is that corporate America is no longer a Meritocracy...it's long past the days when it mattered what skills you have and your productivity rate. Not enough Steve Jobs....too many liberal-socialist types that do too many group-think decisions.
    Coming back home to my film roots. Canon EOS-3 SLR, Canon EOS 1V SLR, 580ex flash, and 5D DSLR shooter. Prime lens only shooter.

  4. #74

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,198
    I had lunch with an old Kodak K Pro marketing type friend today and one of the points we discussed was that Kodak had too many 'order takers' and very few real marketing people.

  5. #75

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    3,602
    Silverglow - I deal a lot with mfg corps and I certainly don't know any that are run by what you describe as liberal-socialist think tanks. Quite the opposite. The trend nowadays is utter CEO totalitarianism. Then that guy stacks the office with MBA's who know even less than he does about
    the business, just to make himself look good. Ever watch, "Rodney Dangerfield goes back to School?"
    Just like that. 75 and hundred year old mfg concerns which has weathered just about every storm
    imaginable don't seem to last more than 6 months to a couple years with a jerk at the helm.

  6. #76

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    3,602
    Yeah, and it would be ironic if Kodak sells off their consumer film division just to see someone else make a real profit at it, simply because it becomes their primary business rather than just another cog in the wheel unsuccessfully trying to flatter the stock market.

  7. #77

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,546
    Quote Originally Posted by DREW WILEY View Post
    Yeah, and it would be ironic if Kodak sells off their consumer film division just to see someone else make a real profit at it, simply because it becomes their primary business rather than just another cog in the wheel unsuccessfully trying to flatter the stock market.
    I have personally experienced a company shut down an entire division rather than accept a generous outside offer on the assumption that the buyer might make it successful and "embarrass" the sellers.
    - Bill Lynch

  8. #78
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    24,530
    Images
    65
    I've found that EK middle management and VPs to be reasonable normal people. I've found the top 3 or 4 people 9with one or two exceptions) to be brusque and somewhat dictatorial people. They had an aristocratic mien.

    PE

  9. #79

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    428
    Quote Originally Posted by wblynch View Post
    I have personally experienced a company shut down an entire division rather than accept a generous outside offer on the assumption that the buyer might make it successful and "embarrass" the sellers.
    Crazy!!

    These kind of stupidities goes all the way back to small companies too, I've been working the last 7-8 years as a consultant for companies with 3-10 people, and sometimes it makes me wonder how things can go so wrong with so few people....
    http://street-photos.net/ | http://felinik.com/ | http://www.facebook.com/jf.felinik

    "The one with the most stuff when he dies wins"

  10. #80
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Central florida,USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,289
    Images
    1
    they enses up where they are, because that's where they wanted to be, out of the analog business.unfortunately, they missed to be inthe digital business in the meantime.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin