Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,963   Posts: 1,558,388   Online: 817
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,050
    Quote Originally Posted by Yashinoff View Post
    I think the problem is that Kodak is still way too big. They've gotten a lot of flak for all of the lay-offs, but I don't see any way to avoid that. If somebody does step up and buy the personal imaging business they're going to have to axe a lot of people too.
    You have no idea of how SMALL in manufacturing area people Kodak is right now.

    Most of you have never seen Kodak Park (now Eastman Business Park) and may think of the manufacturing location as a couple of buildings. In fact, it is a city with its own railroad, fire department, electricity generation, heating and cooling services, water and sewage treatment facilities.

    See http://www.democratandchronicle.com/...odak-Rochester scroll down for an aerial view image.

    See also http://www.ebpvirtualtour.com/ You can see a lot of empty parking lots that once were full!

    Being a 'city' was great when Kodak was a manufacturing giant, now it just complicates things.

  2. #22
    Trasselblad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    43
    Kodak is not going head to head with HP or Epson or any individual or even office printer manufacturer. The niche they want to develop are the specialised graphics market. We are talking big behemoths of digital processing printers some 6-10 metres long built on all sorts of technology fr advertising, graphics, typesetting, etc.

    Now, the decision to drop virtually everything else - including patents for CCD image capture - can be questioned, but the truth of matters is that here are the highest profit margins.

    Film is not profitable (on the scale that Kodak built their plants) any more. No matter how much we all here love the medium.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,158
    This map from an old post by PE:
    http://www.bing.com/maps/default.asp...cl=1&encType=1
    Is building 38 on the corner of W Ridge Road and Lake Avenue?

  4. #24
    Hatchetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    674
    Images
    7
    Fuji would be crazy not to get in there and at least kick the tires a bit. No way Ilford could afford it, nor Kodak employees. It's likely going to be be some buyout shop.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,050
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan Johnson View Post
    This map from an old post by PE:
    http://www.bing.com/maps/default.asp...cl=1&encType=1
    Is building 38 on the corner of W Ridge Road and Lake Avenue?
    It does a nice job of showing the empty spaces where buildings once stood - either imploded (like my buildings) or just torn down. The two buildings I spent most of my time in, once occupied the green patch of grass to the right of Dewey Ave and below the Route 104 marker.

  6. #26
    kb3lms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Reading, PA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    708
    Images
    5
    IIRC building 38 is the long building over off of Weiland Rd. Scroll to the left on the map in the link and down a bit to where 390 and Ridgeway Ave cross. Look up just a bit to the right. it's long and narrow. But never having worked at Kodak Park my building numbering may be off. I forget what number building is at the corner of Lake and Ridge.

    The Park has been decimated! Perez certainly has done his handiwork well.
    All this has happened before, and all this will happen again.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,050
    This is PE's walkthrough of the BING map: http://www.apug.org/forums/archive/i...p/t-64494.html

  8. #28
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by RattyMouse View Post
    Only 3 real options for Kodak film.

    1. Fujifilm
    2. Ilford
    3. Employee buyout.

    Anyone else will either be Wall Street hacks or people who have no idea how to run a film company. Private equity would be a DISASTER for Kodak.
    1. Why would they want to run a company on another continent?
    2. Why would they want to run a company on another continent? They do not have the money.
    3. Just what we need a bunch of people with more money than brains, jump in to run a business that they know nothing about.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  9. #29
    Roger Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Suburbs of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    1. Why would they want to run a company on another continent?
    2. Why would they want to run a company on another continent? They do not have the money.
    3. Just what we need a bunch of people with more money than brains, jump in to run a business that they know nothing about.
    The employees know nothing about it? I've worked many places where that would have been the only way to make it profitable.

    OTOH, I can't imagine enough employees are interested AND have enough money.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    1. Why would they want to run a company on another continent?
    2. Why would they want to run a company on another continent? They do not have the money.
    3. Just what we need a bunch of people with more money than brains, jump in to run a business that they know nothing about.
    Kodak is not selling the manufacturing facilities. They're selling the retail business - the trademarks, kiosks, etc. Some of this could potentially have use for Fujifilm... but I feel like they probably wouldn't see the point in going to Kodak for the supply side of things, it would probably not be a good thing for us on the consumer end. Plus a lot of what they're tying into the deal is "junk", the buyer would have to axe a lot of stuff I'd think.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin