Kodak sell printer/scanners but they don't scan film. This always surprised me. I'd have thought a decent film scanner would have been a good idea.
lots of cameras available
There are MANY options for 35mm available. I thought a couple years back that Kodak was going to sell a Kodak branded Vivitar 35mm, but I think the bankruptcy put the nix on that.
Look for the Leica MP and M7, Nikon F6, FM10, FE10, Vivitar V3800-50, Voigtländer Bessa series, and Zeiss Ikon, low end Promaster, and I am sure there are other 35mm cameras, but all of these are current 2012 35mm cameras available right now.
For Medium format, there are even more options, remember that even the Mamiya RB series is still being produced.
* Just because your eyes are closed, doesn't mean the lights in the darkroom are off. *
* When the film you put in the camera is worth more than the camera you put the film in... *
* When I started using 8x10, it amazed me how many shots were close to the car. *
But he can't quit yet- his work is not finished. Kodak is still breathing.
Originally Posted by bsdunek
Firing the CEO would be a start.
I sure don't know what they can do.
I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.
Ilford had a stroke of genius by introducing the Titan and selling it with a bag of goodies i.e. paper/film. Now it's gotten so popular they introduced 8x10 version at Photokina. There are ways to get out of the hole and get film in people's hands, you just have to stop thinking like the old Kodak CEOs do who are trying to play catch up with the rest of the world.
"One should really use the camera as though tomorrow you'd be stricken blind." - Dorothea Lange
And in October 2012 we will launch another 3 new cameras......
Single Use Cameras with Flash 27 exp XP2 Super
27 exp HP5+
27 exp HP5+ ( Process paid / UK Only )
Not exactly what you meant, but they are nice and a bit of fun and they help younger ( and older ) ones experiment with film.....
Simon. ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
Any new film camera is a step forward, particularly these because they may introduce new people to film and get them hooked.
So that's great news Simon.
Kodak DID sell prosumer film scanners: the RFS 2035, RFS 2035 Plus and RFS 3570. The original RFS 2035 came out in the very early 1990's (and was one of the digital products I worked on).
Originally Posted by Jeff L
If Kodak had continued to work on scanners, I would be willing to bet that the state of the art in prosumer scanning would be much more advanced than it is now.
Originally Posted by Prof_Pixel
“Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”
Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2
Isn't the XP2 Super single use a revival of something Ilford had 10-12 years ago? A welcome break from grainy color.
Originally Posted by Simon R Galley
These dozen words give voice to my most fundamental frustration regarding Kodak over the last five years. Not just limited to film. But everything. And I've been repeatedly thrashed for even bringing it up.
Originally Posted by RattyMouse
Everyone else who has survived—or been resurrected from the dead—has found new and different ways to move forward.* But for some reason all one ever hears from anyone connected with Kodak is "that can't happen."
Why the hell NOT???
I've never seen a more paralyzed organization in my life. The UN is lightning quick by comparison.
Ken (sorry, I try to stay away from this topic, but I'm so weak and they're SO frustrating)
* Impossible Project, Jobo film processors, Aristo replacement tubes, APX film, MCC paper, Lodima paper, Ilford pinhole cameras and accessories, Ilford postcard paper, Leica, Holga, Cosina, all of those toy camera Lomo products, and on and on...
"They are the proof that something was there and no longer is. Like a stain. And the stillness of them is boggling. You can turn away but when you come back they’ll still be there looking at you."
— Diane Arbus, March 15, 1971, in response to a request for a brief statement about photographs