Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,502   Posts: 1,543,386   Online: 788
      
Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 12345678913 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 180
  1. #21
    AgX
    AgX is online now

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    The coating facility in Englad that makes color paper will now be a property of the KPP (Kodak Pension Plan) of England. This is still a Kodak entity in a sense. No other facility is involved.

    PE
    Kodak states of the Personal Imaging and the Document Imaging divisions to have been traded, not about any restrictions to their UK assests alone.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by theoria View Post
    So who will own and run the coating machine in Rochester from now on?
    Quote Originally Posted by AgX View Post
    That Kodak Pension fund.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    All previously posted information contradicts that. Based on the answers in earlier threads, the new owner will be distributing products coated and packaged in Rochester by Kodak…
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    The coating facility in Englad that makes color paper will now be a property of the KPP (Kodak Pension Plan) of England. This is still a Kodak entity in a sense. No other facility is involved...
    OK, I overlooked the English paper output. However, all Kodak-branded film will be supplied to the new UK Pension Plan-owned distribution entity, whatever name it chooses at closing, by Eastman Kodak Company in Rochester.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
    …Colleen -- will the agreement include terms which guarantee the new PI & DI owning entity that Kodak will continue to supply existing sensitized product for a minimum number of years? If so, how many years?
    In light of Ron's input, please revise my question to read "Will the agreement include terms which guarantee the new PI & DI owning entity that Kodak will continue to supply existing film products for a minimum number of years? If so, how many years?

  3. #23
    wy2l's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Junction Meadow
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    91
    OK, clue me in... what's the status of the pension for US Kodak employes and retires?

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Horsham, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by wy2l View Post
    OK, clue me in... what's the status of the pension for US Kodak employes and retires?
    My guess is that the answer involves Perez doubled over in laughter while swimming in cash from his various boni.
    "Panic not my child, the Great Yellow Father has your hand"--Larry Dressler

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Mission Viejo, California
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,462
    It sounds like the UK pensioners were told, 'take this beast or lose all'.

    I have a bad feeling that the US pensioners are on the 'lose all' side of the deal.

    Perhaps KPP will being back Ektachrome ? !!
    - Bill Lynch

  6. #26
    kb3lms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Reading, PA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    696
    Images
    5
    It sounds to me like some of the folks involved in the KPP in the UK looked at the Ilford management buyout and weighed that against their resources and assets and say "well, we could do that too!" Surely there are some former Kodakers that know something about the film business dependent upon the pension plan and willing to go head to head with Ilford, even if only in an advisory capacity to the people really running the business. Think about our friend PE, for instance. He's not in the UK, though, but there must be someone over there like him. Kodak had a major facilities in the UK, right?

    The company I work at has an arm in the UK and I have often gotten the feeling that over there they are more interested in "doing business" and willing to stick their necks out a little for the potential return. (vs the US where sometimes it seems to be more like "where can we buy it and get the production to China.") They usually seem to find a way to make it work - Ilford would be a case in point. Or, Adox.... etc.

    Ilford doesn't supply color film, so maybe these KPP guys see an opportunity there, in addition to Kodak's great B/W products. If my thoughts are correct, two great film manufacturers going head to head with the best products in the world in a competitive and healthy way could be a very good thing for all of us.
    All this has happened before, and all this will happen again.

  7. #27
    kb3lms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Reading, PA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    696
    Images
    5
    Perhaps KPP will being back Ektachrome ? !!
    Could they coat film products today at Harrow or Leeds? I would imagine they did at one time. I have some Portra NC that says manufactured in Great Britain.

    Or, is there enough value there to justify building a smallish coating facility on an Ilford scale? You know, there was that lady who wrote about Kodak's supposed technology to make any film at any time in any quantity.
    Last edited by kb3lms; 04-29-2013 at 12:55 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    All this has happened before, and all this will happen again.

  8. #28
    AgX
    AgX is online now

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,595
    Quote Originally Posted by kb3lms View Post
    Kodak had a major facilities in the UK, right?
    Kodak still has a coating facility in the UK. But I don't understand why you exclude the Rochester facility. It's part of that deal.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Horsham, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by AgX View Post
    Kodak still has a coating facility in the UK. But I don't understand why you exclude the Rochester facility. It's part of that deal.
    No, it's not. Please show me one news article that says that EK will be selling off the Rochester coating facility.
    "Panic not my child, the Great Yellow Father has your hand"--Larry Dressler

  10. #30
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,375
    Images
    60
    Eastman Kodak is a US company, and is the only Kodak that is in bankruptcy.

    The other Kodaks around the world (Kodak Limited in the UK, Kodak Canada in Canada, etc.) are separate entities and are not in bankruptcy. They have their own assets and their own liabilities, including (as I understand it) their own pension funds, and pension obligations to their employees.

    Each of the international Kodaks operate their pension systems under the pension laws of their own country.

    As I understand it, all the international Kodaks are owned by Eastman Kodak. In most cases, therefore, each of their net values show as an asset on Eastman Kodak's balance sheet.

    It appears to me that the pension obligations of Kodak Limited (the UK Kodak):
    1) are at least partially shared by Eastman Kodak, because the Kodak Limited pension fund shows as a creditor of Eastman Kodak; and
    2) apparently have been seriously underfunded in the past, because the extent of the claim is 2.8 billion dollars, and is the largest claim in the bankruptcy.

    As I understand it, Eastman Kodak has no liability to all or most of the other pensioners in the other international Kodaks. I expect that they are set up like Kodak Canada, where the pension fund and its obligations have been set up by Kodak Canada, and that funds assets and obligations are the responsibility of the Canadian corporation - not Eastman Kodak. While the Canadian employees and retirees are not without concern, they have some security in the fact that, when last evaluated (in 2010?) by the department of the Ontario Canada government charged with monitoring private pension funds, the Kodak Canada fund was estimated to have assets sufficient to fund approximately 97% of its projected obligations.

    As I understand it, the majority of those in the USA entitled to pensions from Eastman Kodak have a more complex situation, but there are set aside substantial sums for them as well.

    I don't know why the shortfall is so large in the UK. I expect that Eastman Kodak is a creditor for UK pensions because of the peculiarities of UK law.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 12345678913 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin