Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,958   Posts: 1,586,108   Online: 1134
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Rhodes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Figueira da Foz, Portugal
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    426

    Kodak article in PetaPixel: Kodaks Problem Child


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,092
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhodes View Post

    No

  3. #3
    Rhodes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Figueira da Foz, Portugal
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    426
    oki

  4. #4
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,756
    Ron Mowrey is PE. Ron Andrews is fairly active on Photo.net.
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

  5. #5
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,561
    Images
    65
    We know each other and communicate from time to time. We were both interviewed at the time of the Kodachrome demise but only his portion was used for the final version. He had much more to do with Kodachrome than I did.

    The article is good but cannot tell everything due to space limitations and so it is terse and to the point.

    If Ron Andrews is reading, HI Ron.

    PE

  6. #6
    Hexavalent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    550
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by lxdude View Post
    Ron Mowrey is PE. Ron Andrews is fairly active on Photo.net.
    Not to be confused with the "Two Ronnies" of British comedy fame.
    - Ian

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,068
    I've never been a marketing nor manager person, but if Kodak really was in love with film, as this article proposes, they should have fought digital in the marketplace. Imagine a commercial, early 90's, maybe even as late as the early 2000's. Two photographers, maybe a son, and a daughter, all excited about the photos they took on vacation. When mom or dad asks to see some pictures, sister brings out a photo album, so does sonny. But when pop asks "Hey son, can you make me a copy of this print?" sonny replies, "I'd love to dad but my hard drive crashed and I lost all the files..." but then sister says "Oh that's ok, I got it too. Let me get the negative..."

    I'm not saying Kodak would be all profitable and peachy now, but maybe, just maybe, SOMEONE somewhere could have developed a marketing strategy to show people what advantages film had over digital. And they could still launch such a campaign today, only pointing out how cool and retro film is...
    In life you only get one great dog, one great car, and one great woman. Pet the dog. Drive the car. Make love to the woman. Don't mix them up.

  8. #8
    AgX
    AgX is online now

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,116
    That article does as many here at Apug do too, only perceiving Kodak as a company serving photo-amateurs and maybe professionial photographers.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    I wonder where Kodak would be if it were not for the shorting out of the market in 2008. I wonder if the repeal of the uptick rule in 2007 led to the naked shorting that was so rampant in 2008. And at the very least, were it not for that, would we still have Kodachrome today? While many consider digital to be a "permanent" process, any permanence is strictly in the digital file that has to be constantly transferred across storage mediums (media?) as computer technology changes. No actual output print of a digital image is probably any more stable than an old C-22 film. Kodachrome was the only truly permanent physical color likeness.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,092
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfeye View Post
    ... if Kodak really was in love with film, as this article proposes, they should have fought digital in the marketplace.
    A major project I spent a lot of time working on in the late '80s and early '90s was the Kodak Premiere Image Enhancement System. It was a 'film in - film out' system designed to replace complicated camera and darkroom image composition work. It was designed to encourage the use of film.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin