Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,521   Posts: 1,572,240   Online: 842
      
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 111

Thread: Perez

  1. #21
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,565
    Images
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Carnie View Post
    I vote to replace Perez with Mustafa.
    Mustafa would have that improbability drive and always keep the board members guessing.

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  2. #22
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,382
    Images
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by MattKing View Post
    Ah, Ron ... this requires three hands.

    And my understanding is that Sony weren't the only purchasers of the motion picture profuct.
    I know that, and that is what it will need to save Kodak.

    PE

  3. #23

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    Advertising. Primetime TV (what there still is of it), and AM radio. Although I don't generally listen to much of it myself, I wonder what kind of film sales could generated on the Dash Limburger program, for instance. Or some network TV presentation. Do you realize the average 21 year old doesn't know what film is? My point is, film doesn't have to die like this.

  4. #24
    Bob Carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Toronto-Ontario
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    4,682
    Images
    14
    Film is not dying yet, just those who don't want to use it.

    =Tom1956;1522780]Advertising. Primetime TV (what there still is of it), and AM radio. Although I don't generally listen to much of it myself, I wonder what kind of film sales could generated on the Dash Limburger program, for instance. Or some network TV presentation. Do you realize the average 21 year old doesn't know what film is? My point is, film doesn't have to die like this.[/QUOTE]

  5. #25
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,956
    Images
    108
    Kodak Film is equivalent to 5000 megapixel camera.

    Kodak must write this to everywhere.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,987
    Not only is that factually incorrect, it doesn't matter to most people anyway. They don't print photos. they don't need that kind of resolution.

  7. #27
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,956
    Images
    108
    They dont need but they dont know they dont need it. That ad would create a lots of internet , blog , forum , magazine , newspaper discussions and flame the peoples interest. Lots of people dont need 1 billion dollar per day but they would love to own it.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustafa Umut Sarac View Post
    Kodak Film is equivalent to 5000 megapixel camera.

    Kodak must write this to everywhere.
    Tests at Kodak when the PhotoCD was being developed said that a 35mm image (including the results of the optical system) had about 16 megapixels. This would mean that to get 5000 megapixels, the film image would have to be 19 x 24 inches and the camera optical system would have to have 35mm camera quality.

  9. #29
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,956
    Images
    108
    I asked at APUG about how many megapixel equivalent to film , people laughed and reported petapixel. I dont know who is right ?

  10. #30
    Ken Nadvornick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,577
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael R 1974 View Post
    Not only is that factually incorrect, it doesn't matter to most people anyway. They don't print photos. they don't need that kind of resolution.
    True, but he's still bigger-picture correct. Smart phone users don't need 41-megapixel cameras either just to post pictures to Facebook, but Nokia just introduced one. Why? To boost sales by boosting the mine-is-bigger-than-yours mindset. Marketing has little to do with reality.

    Nokia Aims to Pwn All Camera Phones With 41-Megapixel Lumia 1020

    Ken
    "They are the proof that something was there and no longer is. Like a stain. And the stillness of them is boggling. You can turn away but when you come back they’ll still be there looking at you."

    — Diane Arbus, March 15, 1971, in response to a request for a brief statement about photographs

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin