Can't say I disagree Bill. I used to go a lot to the cinema in 2011-12 when my theater was 80% film. Weekend prices were about 9$...
Originally Posted by wblynch
Now it's 80% digital, keeping a single theater with a film projector. Prices have increased 4$ and they now put phone company ads in the trailer section. IMO, like youtube but in a theater!
I plain disagree with forcing everyone to "move forward", big theaters might do well, but small theaters won't.
I don't go to movies. The Hollywood whackos have gotten to be such wingdings and lunatics, I prefer not to contribute.
There are several corporate strategies going on here. One is the fact that lots of movies nowadays are "action films" with a lot of digital mickey
mouse and so-so acting which technologically matches this new form of release. Another important factor is that the big film operatives can
basically bankrupt neighborhood theatres and take over by forcing them into unrealistic new projection debt. Distribution per se is simplified
(though filmmakers themselves can still be creative and decide to use real film for the initial filming). ... None of this affects me. I shoot sheet
film, and have solved that whole theatre issue the simple way ... I simply don't go to movies anymore. Why bother if there's nothing special to the experience.
I agree about the theater experience. The screens get smaller. The rooms get smaller. If it is digitally projected it is even closer to what I can see at home. It's not special anymore. I'd rather stay at home or at a friends house and not have someone sitting behind me talking and eating the whole time.
I remember a while ago concerns about how halting MP film producion affected Still film, as the latter was "subsidized" by the former; At least in the sense of economies of scale. But yes... the only manufacturer that keeps both lines is Kodak. If MP film demand decreases, let's see what would happen to Still film.
Originally Posted by DREW WILEY
Fuji... well, are "more or less commited" and the other small manufacturers do some MP or none at all.
And the last movie I went to see, man of steel, used Kodak stock; Better than nothing. Due to prices and as our group of mates don't get together as much and in the way we used to do... I am happy by not going to the cinema.
Yes, it is becoming less special. With film projection there's still some "cinematography look" (though in camera film still keeps it) but with pure digital it just seems a big version of youtube.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
As a filmmaker, I found it quite easy to obtain 10000 feet of Fuji stock second hand for not quite money.
Developing can be done for a little more, and an optical finish for not much more.
Price gets interesting when labs jack up prices of scanning film for DI purposes because of one reason or another. Cutting an inter positive can be a fantastic learning event.
Sent from my LT30at using Tapatalk 2
- J. Richard
4x5 Speed Graphic, Looking for another 8x10.
A minor but important use for motion film will be archiving. There is a lot of skepticism in the industry about just how permanent any kind of
digital record will be. Rapid obsolescence is the whole key to the continued growth of the current electronics industry - today's technology
making sure yesterday's won't work any more, and coming up with something yet again. Pretty much the Tower of Babel for profit - nobody will be able to communicate with another generation, in this case visually. I'm sure I'll get flak for stating this - but all one has to do is look up all the chatter in the industry itself to understand it's a real issue. But cine film affects still film production only to a certain extent. The products are different, even the base material tends to be different. Not all still films are related in this respect either. ... and while the dust has yet to settle for that particular industry, the reorganization of Kodak into a smaller dedicated entity is actually good news in terms of sustainability. Things get based on real demand and real profit instead of a lot of stock market ballyhoo, with one division subsidizing venture in another. If film ends up costing more, so be it - I'll just have to skip paying to see another movie not worth watching anyway.
Well i used to be able to cross the border from el paso,tx to juarez mexico... 8.00 in el paso normal theatre experience... for about $5.00-$6.00 in juarez, mexico i would be able to sit in a leather la-z-boy type chair where my feet would go up... get awesome hot dogs with everything on it and mixed (alcoholic) drinks, catered to us... this was a 10-15 minute drive, given that crossing back the border was 5-30 minutes if we came back late enough.
on a second note... the movie industry used to be able to make a killing after movies were released for private viewing... through video sales... although they still charge $33 a blu-ray disc, fear of obsolescence (which is so apparent today), doesn't appeal to much to people. Any why re-watch an summer action film (which for the most part lacks much intrinsic value) when you can watch anything imaginable on youtube. the reason they charge so much at a movie theatre is for the 'experience' which for me was cool... but as mentioned with digital projectors and sloppy sound producing, it's just not the same. Once people noticed the difference a sound system did to an in home 'movie experience' the game changed drastically as well.
The last straw was drawn when people began to upload movies online the same day they were released. why pay $25 for tickets, plus 15 for popcorn! and soda, when you can enjoy a MEAL or whatever snacks and the same movie IN bed on your computer screen. no driving, no lines, no problems. All i have to say, is i agree the 'experience' is lacking for what they charge, i want my lay-z-boy
Pardon me for that. I can't repeal it now, but it prayed on my mind that this isn't the forum for that kind of talk. The prostatitis has gotten me down again and makes me cranky. Please pardon.
Originally Posted by Tom1956
In the Midwest they have theaters that have that service, beer, hot dogs, feet up, leather chair, servers, etc, and the price is less than my price here in CT... With grimy chairs and small screen. Then again Midwest has the room...
Originally Posted by mesantacruz
Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller