Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,886   Posts: 1,520,604   Online: 1030
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    Dr Croubie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    rAdelaide
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,024
    Quote Originally Posted by hoffy View Post
    Fancy this coming up after the conversation that was had on Monday night, Polyglot! Don't show this to Steve....
    Damn, makes me wish I'd made it on Monday (would have come, but it was this pesky business of the missus turning 30 that day...)
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.

  2. #12
    Prest_400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Spain
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by Poisson Du Jour View Post

    Interesting stuff from a lab. I don't use local labs for cheapie prints because they are digital-centric and frown on the notion of film photographers. But my own prints at pro-level cost anything from $66 to $300 (then add framing cost). The best must, must, must be printed, no exception. They'll be around for a long, long time, much longer than the troves of data masquerading as "photographs" on millions of PCs. None of my early digi pics from around 2001 on CDs are readable now. Not that I care (I remember I kind of looked embarrassingly younger then...)
    [...]
    I remain unmoved by overtures in digital that it has any degree of permanency because warnings were made many decades ago. But you can't tell today's generation of know-it-alls! Are their photographs ever going to be printed? Ever...?
    Thankfully here, in Europe, there are many labs that work both with film and digital. In my city there is even a B&W+inkjet specialist.
    I found an online photofinisher that does 75 free 4x6" prints, all the time, so I pay just shipping. They make the profits with all the more "gimmicky" stuff, as photobooks, albums, calendar and photo gifts. Meanwhile, I've printed just about all the snaps I have worthy for printing. Given some prints of friends to them. They like it.
    And got printed some scans and files to Fuji Pearl paper (metallic), ironically, half of them were shot with kodachrome, so probably the original will outlast the print.
    My dad loves his picture with a forest backdrop I took 3 years ago.

    A rather overlooked feature that fuji minilabs have (at least both of the photofinishers above) is that they an print the name of the file at the back but all labs I know don't advertise it. Makes for perfect captions. Such as date+location.

    Our current generation (I am 18) doesn't mind printing. An acquittance told me last summer "it's expensive, I just put them on Facebook and there it goes"... That triggered my interest in printing... Is it really that expensive? Perhaps but on smaller big sizes (A4/8x10) and for the worthy stuff, IMO, not.
    Anyways, most of the cameraphones are ideous for prints. I suppose the high end smartphones are fine up to 5x7" on good light however.

    I once lost two different folders of photos. One was of a school event and I got upset. Another would deem to be important as one of the persons (family friend) snapped would die at a young age (40s)... And we had almost no more pictures of her!

  3. #13
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,163
    Images
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Pioneer View Post
    Only if stored properly and only if the next King does not want to erase what you wrote!
    I recommend slate.
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    South Africa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    451
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Poisson Du Jour View Post
    One moggie here is quite enough. Can't imagine how a little old lady can feed 26 from her pension... catastrophic number, really...
    Cataclysmic, more like it. It would put me in a catatonic state. The whining around feeding time of our two mongrels already is hard to bear.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    696
    Boy this hit home.. Last week my Seagate 1 TB HD went belly up. Nearly had an heart attack. I work a phot lab at a AF base. My boss is a tech savy guy and he offered to stick the HD in a toaster device. After using a technique by using enersia, we got the plates to read and drop the digital images and other thing of importance on his computer and then tranfered them on a MAC My Passport Hd drive. It was scary..Before that, I call Disk Saver in San Fran in California and they qouted me a min of $750.00 to retrieve data. I dodged a bullet. I guess the closes thing to archival is photographic negitives. Unless they fall victim to water or fire. I was thinking..? How many layer of back up do you need? It seem infinant!! So yhea.. print your better things and go back to acid free photo Albums.

    Todd

  6. #16

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    South Africa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    451
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by ToddB View Post
    Unless they fall victim to water or fire. I was thinking..? How many layer of back up do you need? It seem infinant!! So yhea.. print your better things and go back to acid free photo Albums.

    Todd
    I had the misfortune of having to change accommodation while I was at university. I had my stuff stored for a week while I was away, and before I could move into the new accommodation. The storage room got flooded during a torrential downpour, and when I got back, there was damp in all my books, and also some of my sleeved films. A large part went unscathed, but I did lose a few films. Nowadays, I store my negatives a lot better. I try to scan everything, too, but it is time-consuming. At least that way I have an electronic copy if the analogue version is lost, but it is obviously not quite the same thing.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    696
    I should mention too. That I had minor mis happen in dark room. I tipped over my beer on some of negs. I took them out quickly rinsed them trough some photo flo and dried them. They are OK. After that.. I realized that I need to put thing away so that doesn't happen again.

    Todd

  8. #18
    Dr Croubie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    rAdelaide
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,024
    Oh the irony.

    Last night I went to dev the two B+W (9x12 apx100) shots I did on the weekend, in my 3-reel paterson and Mod54.
    I've heard some stories about people using these too violently and the film slipping out.
    So I was so careful, did a Rodinal 1hr semi-stand, no inversions just the occasional roll along the benchtop, same for the stop and the fixer. (I know they were fine after the fixer cos I took a peep before washing, still in place in the holder)
    But then I was washing, and was too violent, the film slipped out of the holder, and with rolling it along the bench the Mod54 rolled around inside and put a nice big scratch along both (of course, 1/3rd from the top, right where the faces are).

    So there's the digital karma gods getting angry with me, negatives aren't infallible either. (but yes, totally my fault, I'll only make that mistake once).
    I'll pick up the Porta and Astia from Atkins today, hopefully there's something salvageable there...
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.

  9. #19
    cliveh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,090
    Images
    341
    I’m a fan of inkjet printing because now it is becoming really good and better than much darkroom stuff. If you work with alternative processes, you quite often reach chemical stages where the image changes colour, fogs, etc. But hey presto, scan it and print ink jet and we are into another ball park. This is where digital is an enhancement of the chemical process. No either or but a useful addition.

    “The contemplation of things as they are, without error or confusion, without substitution or imposture, is in itself a nobler thing than a whole harvest of invention”

    Francis Bacon

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,034
    This thread was semi-timely for me, so thank you for starting it. I recently acquired a Mamiya RB67 for cheap, and have shot 5-6 rolls of various film with it. I really like how the big negatives scan but haven't got 'round to printing. Reading this, I got off my duff and brought my darkroom back to life last night. My Dektol was brown but it still worked (the powder was, I mean, I try and keep the bag airtight and only use what I need for a print session) and after 3 misprints I got a nice image to hang and dry, and I was only up til a quarter after midnight. Ah the joys of a non-light-tight laundry darkroom.

    What an amazing machine, that RB67, and a lovely print of an old steam engine. Thanks for the prompt to get me going!
    In life you only get one great dog, one great car, and one great woman. Pet the dog. Drive the car. Make love to the woman. Don't mix them up.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin