Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,754   Posts: 1,515,970   Online: 956
      
Page 1 of 9 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 85
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    396

    Telegraph: Traditional camera film makes a come back

    Hello,

    some positive news:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...come-back.html

    I've got confirmative information from some other manufacturers, distributors and labs. Some of them still see decreasing sales, but this trend is significantly slowing down (official Kodak statement of Kodak Germany), some see stabilised sales and some increasing sales.

    Example: The Lomographic Society International in Vienna sold 500,000 new cameras in 2010.
    And 4 million films. They are expecting to sell 8 million films this year.

    Best regards,
    Henning

  2. #2
    hpulley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,214
    Images
    75
    "...And the rare 120mm film..."
    Harry Pulley - Visit the BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE FORUM

    Happiness is...

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    South Norfolk, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,859
    Images
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by Henning Serger View Post
    Hello,

    some positive news:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...come-back.html

    I've got confirmative information from some other manufacturers, distributors and labs. Some of them still see decreasing sales, but this trend is significantly slowing down (official Kodak statement of Kodak Germany), some see stabilised sales and some increasing sales.



    Example: The Lomographic Society International in Vienna sold 500,000 new cameras in 2010.
    And 4 million films. They are expecting to sell 8 million films this year.

    Best regards,
    Henning
    I'm still not convinced the 'Lomographic Society International' is good for analogue photography, it seems to be an exercise in branding and fashion over much else. I guess the trendies have their place, but from a broader perspective, one could buy a basic Bronica ETRSi SLR, Nikon kit, or similar for the price of some of these "toy" cameras.

    Secondly, I fail to see why one would buy Lomo film. It is hardly difficult to get hold of out of date film from one's own stockpile, and in general surely it is preferable to have the known quality of fresh in-date Kodak, Fuji, ILFORD film?

    It is depressing if many of these 'lomographers' need to be spoon fed the marketing hype in order to develop an interest in non digital photography.

    Tom

  4. #4
    bighilt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    24
    I think that is good news indeed.
    -- Hilton --
    www.thelightstuff.blogspot.com
    Tips and tutorials and mainly photographic musings!

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    396
    Hello Tom,

    I mentioned Lomo only to give one example of a field with increasing film and film camera sales. It was not a "pro Lomo statement". Only data.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Kershaw View Post
    I'm still not convinced the 'Lomographic Society International' is good for analogue photography,
    I think it has both positive and negative effects.
    Positive:
    + Additional demand for film. Helps the film manufacturers to keep the lines running. Both for original brand and OEM production (some of the Lomo brand films are now even made by Kodak).
    + Young people get involved in film photography. Some of them go forward and discover "serious" film photography, too (I know a few which took this way).
    + Film is again considered attractive for young photographers. That is very important, because digital marketing massage for years was "film is outdated and only for old guys".

    Negative:
    - The "film is unperfect and unpredictabel" marketing campaign and the flood of unsharp pictures, and shots with extremeley oversaturated colors give a wrong impression for beginners of what film is really capable of.
    - For lots of these beginners is film = lomography.
    - For those who don't know that you can buy films and cameras much cheaper at other stores, the high prices at Lomography stores may be discouraging to use film more often.
    - The LSI is now a bigger company than Foma, Fotokemika, Filmotec, Adox, Maco and Freestyle altogether. With their huge success their market power is significantly growing. That could be a problem for some manufacturers and distributors in the future (but they could avoid this problem by learning from LSI, TIP, Redbull and other marketing innovators and creating own marketing strategies and strengthen their market power).

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Kershaw View Post
    Secondly, I fail to see why one would buy Lomo film. It is hardly difficult to get hold of out of date film from one's own stockpile, and in general surely it is preferable to have the known quality of fresh in-date Kodak, Fuji, ILFORD film?
    By far most of the film LSI sell is fresh Kodak, Fuji, Ilford etc stock.

    By the way, the Lomo movement started in 1991. In 1997 the commercial Lomo business was established. It is definitely not a short dated trend.
    The whole toy camera movement, including Holgas, Blackbirds etc., is an established part of photography now.
    Lots of succesful professionals and artists are using these cameras and techniques as well.
    The company producing the Holga cameras, Hong Kong based "Universal Electronic Industries" (they started their business with manufacturing of flashes for OEM production), is concentrating their marketing efforts on this art market ( see www.holgainspire.com ).

    Best regards,
    Henning

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,705
    At least it is looking up for film.

    Jeff

  7. #7
    michaelbsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Carolina
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,092
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Kubach
    At least it is looking up for film.

    Jeff
    Being a natural born cynic I'd probably say it isn't quite so dismal. Not so sure it is really looking "up" just yet.

    Let's hope that the glow on the horizon truly heralds sunrise.
    Michael Batchelor
    Industrial Informatics, Inc.
    www.industrialinformatics.com

    The camera catches light. The photographer catches life.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oxfordshire, UK.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,180
    Regardless of what the article says, I think it's great that a such a high profile site as the Telegraph has given film a wider publicity.
    Steve.

  9. #9
    mono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    494
    Images
    16
    As we formerly said here: The snapshooters keep our hobby alive.
    Nowadays these are the "lomos"!
    ________

    Regards
    Folker

    MonoArt - fine photographs

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Oxfordshire, UK.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,180
    Incidentally, selling 500,000 new cameras & 4 million rolls of film during the biggest recession since the 1930s is some achievement. I wonder if that is up or down from sales in the early 2000s.
    Steve.

Page 1 of 9 1234567 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin