Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,982   Posts: 1,523,867   Online: 1058
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    45

    Kodak Licenses Projection Patents to Imax

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-1...ues-mount.html


    Kodak Licenses Projection Patents to Imax

    By Dan Hart - Oct 17, 2011 5:52 AM GMT+0800 .Tweet inShare.2
    More

    Eastman Kodak Co. (EK) agreed to provide laser-projection technology to Imax Corp. (IMAX), bolstering revenue as the unprofitable 131-year-old camera company seeks to stave off bankruptcy.

    Kodak, based in Rochester, New York, will receive an upfront payment of more than $10 million, a milestone payment and ongoing royalties, said a person with knowledge of the matter. Imax gains technology allowing it to expand the use of digital projection on its giant-screen theaters, the Mississauga, Ontario-based company said today in a statement.

    The 10-year deal helps Kodak narrow a cash shortfall and advances a goal of generating $250 million to $350 million in revenue this year from licensing intellectual property. The company said on Sept. 30 that it has “no intention” of filing for bankruptcy.

    “This is the ordinary course of business and I think, if anything, it demonstrates that they have intellectual property other than the image capture and printing side,” said Mark Kaufman, an analyst at Rafferty Capital Markets in New York.

    The cash will be used for general corporate purposes, said Gerard Meuchner, a spokesman for Eastman Kodak. He declined to disclose terms.

    Bright Image
    Kodak put a separate set of digital-imaging patents valued at an estimated $3 billion up for sale in July. The company is facing pressure from its bondholders to use cash from asset sales to pay down debt, people familiar with the situation said last week. Some bondholders have met with bankruptcy lawyers and restructuring advisers to help ensure they are paid, the people said.

    The Kodak technology will enhance the brightness of digital projection, Imax Chief Executive Officer Rich Gelfond said. This will enable Imax to display pictures using digital images on its screens larger than 80 feet (24 meters) instead of being dependent on 70mm film, as well as in dome theaters, Imax said. The technology is expected to debut by the second half of 2013, the company said.

    “The Eastman Kodak technology helps present a really bright image,” Gelfond said in a telephone interview. “The cost comes down and enables this to happen.”

    Kodak engineers will work with Imax employees during the next 18 months to bring the technology to Imax theaters, the company said. Kodak’s technology is expected to illuminate screens as large as 100 feet and dome theaters with a brightness and clarity not currently available, Imax said.

    Kodak’s operations used $847 million in cash during the first half of this year, company filings show. At the end of the second quarter, Kodak had $957 million in cash and near-cash items.

    Eastman Kodak shares fell 4 cents on Oct. 14 to $1.24. The stock has declined 77 percent this year. Imax slid 2 cents to $17.38, and the shares have fallen 38 percent this year.

  2. #2
    tomalophicon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT.
    Shooter
    Sub 35mm
    Posts
    1,562
    Images
    24
    ...the people said.


    So Kodak are selling Imax an idea, so that Imax will no longer buy Kodak film?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by tomalophicon View Post
    ...the people said.


    So Kodak are selling Imax an idea, so that Imax will no longer buy Kodak film?
    I think even though Kodak is not selling the patent to IMAX, IMAX will eventually use less and less Kodak film, it it because they are installing all IMAX digital projector to new IMAX screen.

  4. #4
    tomalophicon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT.
    Shooter
    Sub 35mm
    Posts
    1,562
    Images
    24
    Sorry, I meant lease.
    Got ya. Sad state of affair in my opinion. But that's progress.

  5. #5
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,587
    Quote Originally Posted by lonelyboy View Post
    I think even though Kodak is not selling the patent to IMAX, IMAX will eventually use less and less Kodak film, it it because they are installing all IMAX digital projector to new IMAX screen.
    I think that's it. And if they don't start making money off it, someone else will come along and make something similar.
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

  6. #6
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,555
    Images
    122
    If Kodak's patents are worth so much, why isn't Kodak using them to make profitable product rather than selling or licencing them?

    Kodak has the advantage that it doesn't need to pay for these patented ideas.


    Steve.

  7. #7
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,559
    Images
    10
    I have seen quite a few companies go under in the last 20 years, and the clearest sign of terminal tail spin is a big press release for marginal success stories. A company burning almost 1 billion touting a sale of 10 million would certainly fall into this category. Especially if this sale cuts into some other market for that company
    Trying to be the best of whatever I am, even if what I am is no good.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,531
    Quote Originally Posted by Rudeofus View Post
    I have seen quite a few companies go under in the last 20 years, and the clearest sign of terminal tail spin is a big press release for marginal success stories. A company burning almost 1 billion touting a sale of 10 million would certainly fall into this category. Especially if this sale cuts into some other market for that company
    Sadly, that's very true....

    "The cash will be used for general corporate purposes, said Gerard Meuchner, a spokesman for Eastman Kodak".....basically the sale of a capital asset to meet revenue deficits. Not a good long term answer...it's a bit like selling the family silver to pay this week's food bill.

  9. #9
    Helinophoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    550
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Smith View Post
    If Kodak's patents are worth so much, why isn't Kodak using them to make profitable product rather than selling or licencing them?

    Kodak has the advantage that it doesn't need to pay for these patented ideas.


    Steve.
    Maybe they need money, fast...?
    Creating a whole product line demands R&D, production facilities, materials etc etc....that's a long-term investment.

    The thing I am wondering about is where is Kodak really heading? Are they planning to scale down everything and end up as something completely different than today?
    -
    "Nice picture, you must have an amazing camera."
    Visit my photography blog at: http://helino-photo.blogspot.com

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    South Norfolk, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,865
    Images
    62
    IMAX Digital is in no way similar to the traditional 15 perf 70mm film version. The resolution is apparently only slightly better than standard 2K digital cinema, and the screen size is dramatically smaller.

    Tom

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin