Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,821   Posts: 1,581,780   Online: 1029
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Chicago and San Francisco
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    37

    What do you rate the new Portra 160 4x5?

    It's not so "new" anymore, but I'm talking about the only kind kodak currently makes (the latest version that they started making after discontinuing the NC/VC films).

    While I intend on doing my own tests, I'm curious to hear what your tests with Portra 160 4x5 have shown the film's native ISO to be. Also, if you'd care to share your test technique/scene you chose to conduct the test on, I would be very interested.


    With 35mm Portra 160, I usually rate it at ISO 50, or even slower if the contrast of the scene is low. I am often shooting naturally lit interiors with a substantial contrast range. I have gotten a few 4x5 shots developed, and from what I've seen, the 4x5 Portra has just as much if not more highlight range than 35mm Portra. I have access to a color darkroom at my school, as well as Imacon scanners, so I have plenty of good printing tools to test with.

  2. #2
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,799
    Box speed works very well. There is plenty of latitude to work with when the box speed is used.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  3. #3
    tomalophicon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Canberra, ACT.
    Shooter
    Sub 35mm
    Posts
    1,562
    Images
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Xander Fischer View Post
    It's not so "new" anymore, but I'm talking about the only kind kodak currently makes (the latest version that they started making after discontinuing the NC/VC films).

    While I intend on doing my own tests, I'm curious to hear what your tests with Portra 160 4x5 have shown the film's native ISO to be. Also, if you'd care to share your test technique/scene you chose to conduct the test on, I would be very interested.


    With 35mm Portra 160, I usually rate it at ISO 50, or even slower if the contrast of the scene is low. I am often shooting naturally lit interiors with a substantial contrast range. I have gotten a few 4x5 shots developed, and from what I've seen, the 4x5 Portra has just as much if not more highlight range than 35mm Portra. I have access to a color darkroom at my school, as well as Imacon scanners, so I have plenty of good printing tools to test with.
    'What do you rate the new Portra 160?'

    10/10!

  4. #4
    L Gebhardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    NH - Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,719
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    18
    I get good results at box speed too. But if I don't need the speed I think I get better results at 100. But I haven't taken the time to do any formal testing.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin