Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,926   Posts: 1,585,145   Online: 877
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    116

    Tetenal C-41 - Green cast?

    Hi all,
    Using Tetenal C-41, and the last two rolls I developed together (in a Jobo CPE2) came out with a green cast to them. I've attached a picture - the strip of negatives above is from a previous different roll development with the kit, the strip of negatives on the bottom is from one of the rolls in question.

    Temperature control was tight, over the 3:45 minutes of dev the temperature hardly deviated. However, this was roll 10, is this sort of result indicative of exhausted developer?

    I've searched but didn't find anything conclusive.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0178x.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	120.8 KB 
ID:	49083

  2. #2
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,553
    Images
    65
    If these 3 were processed in C41, then there is something seriously wrong with the one on top. The one on the bottom looks roughly correct for an E6 film that has been cross processed. Kind of foggy and high in contrast/density.

    There are no edge markings on the film on top either, indicating that there was either none to start with or that there was no development. Are you sure that this is a photographic film, and not a leader? In any event, it does not appear to be a "real" film to me.

    PE

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,068
    I've seen the same result from too-warm development. Is that possibly the culprit?
    In life you only get one great dog, one great car, and one great woman. Pet the dog. Drive the car. Make love to the woman. Don't mix them up.

  4. #4
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,553
    Images
    65
    Unhardened film will wash off the support. So, yes this can be too warm development.

    An example would be an E4 film in E6 or C41.

    PE

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    If these 3 were processed in C41, then there is something seriously wrong with the one on top. The one on the bottom looks roughly correct for an E6 film that has been cross processed. Kind of foggy and high in contrast/density.

    There are no edge markings on the film on top either, indicating that there was either none to start with or that there was no development. Are you sure that this is a photographic film, and not a leader? In any event, it does not appear to be a "real" film to me.

    PE
    Apologies for the very confusing image - the background is a Kenro translucent negative sheet - so in the picture, there are 4 strips of negatives in total, the top and bottom ones are in the negative sheet and the middle two are on top of the negative sheet. An oversight on my part

    They are both exactly the same film, Kodak Gold 200, a big difference in result. My issue is that the 3rd strip of negatives does not look like the 2nd.

    Wolfeye - I'm not entirely sure, I thought it was at 38 degrees from the beginning.

  6. #6
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,553
    Images
    65
    Frankly, I saw 5 strips, with one behind the good color neg strop and one at the far bottom.

    I separated the wheat from the chaff and commented on top, middle front and just below middle.

    Therefore, top looks like some kind of non-film or unhardened film, middle front is good color neg, middle back is like top, just below middle is apparently cross processed E6 film, and far bottom is like top. The bad ones look as if there is no emulsion left, no image left, or was never a photographic film at all.

    PE

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    Frankly, I saw 5 strips, with one behind the good color neg strop and one at the far bottom.

    I separated the wheat from the chaff and commented on top, middle front and just below middle.
    All in all, a rather poorly executed photo then for which I apologise. It can make a difficult deduction even more so.

    But thanks for the observations PE. So, what can go bad in C-41 home processing to make it look like a cross-process? I checked the temperature throughout the development stage and it stayed stable, which is why I'm not 100% sure about the too warm development.

  8. #8
    brucemuir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Metro DC area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,264
    Images
    4
    Is the bottom strip completely dry?

  9. #9
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,665
    Images
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by freecom2 View Post
    Hi all,
    Using Tetenal C-41, and the last two rolls I developed together (in a Jobo CPE2) came out with a green cast to them. I've attached a picture - the strip of negatives above is from a previous different roll development with the kit, the strip of negatives on the bottom is from one of the rolls in question.

    Temperature control was tight, over the 3:45 minutes of dev the temperature hardly deviated. However, this was roll 10, is this sort of result indicative of exhausted developer?

    I've searched but didn't find anything conclusive.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0178x.jpg 
Views:	92 
Size:	120.8 KB 
ID:	49083
    You didn't accidentally put B&W through did you (the clear ones)?

  10. #10
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,553
    Images
    65
    Instead of E6 film cross processed, the one below the good C41 negative could have missed the blix, or bleach, and fix. Instead of fog, the high brown dmin is probably retained silver and silver halide. If that is true, then the tail end solutions are bad or exhausted.

    And the blue-green strips do indeed resemble any number of films that cannot withstand a 100F process and that includes B&W films.

    PE

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin