Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,561   Posts: 1,545,274   Online: 798
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3

    Explanation of push + 2

    Hello,

    I was just researching pictures that have been taken on Velvia 50 rated at different ASA, since this is what I am going to do soon.
    I stumbled on a few photographs from Pedro Fonseca which I find quite good (both the content and the outcome of the processing).
    Under all the Velvia 50 photographs which he shot at ASA 400 (Example), he wrote "developed push +2".
    What does he mean by that? Did he rate the the film at ASA 400 and pushed it another two stops? It doesn't look like it.
    Unless he underexposed by two stops and then pushed them back in postprocessing. But the photographs would show more grain, wouldn't they?

    I'm looking forward to your explanations.

    Cheers,
    Vandelay

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,290
    Images
    20
    Normally that would mean that he set his meter to ISO 400 and asked the lab to push two stops (from normal), even though ISO 400 should require a three stop push from ISO 50. A three stop push, though, might have been unacceptably contrasty, and maybe his meter was overexposing a bit, so it's possible that based on his tests, a two stop push looked better to him than a three stop push. "+2" is just what you tell the lab when you want a 2-stop push.

    You can't tell much about the grain from a scan of that size.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    You can't tell much about the grain from a scan of that size.
    That's true.

    So basically, what you're saying is: the lab would have pushed it to ISO 200... ?

  4. #4
    Bill Burk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    3,306
    Images
    46
    Right, and although he "underexposed" yet another stop because he used a higher EI...

    It looks like this threw his midtones down into moody low-tones...

    And it kept the highlights from burning out.

    Not a bad experimental style.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3
    Thanks to both of you.
    I'm a bit smarter now.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin