Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,222   Posts: 1,659,608   Online: 788
      
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 123
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    8,093
    Images
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Athiril View Post
    I work in a lab, with dip and dunk E-6. I also participate in group film orders from B&H.

    400X is one of the rarest films to come here for processing, and on group orders from B&H also. We get more Kodak E-6 still than 400X.

    Same with Neopan 400 for B&W.
    I almost feel like its the nature of the type of film that beat it... Because you don't shoot models with it (as far as I understand its still more of a landscape film) so you usually have a tripod anyway, so why use a grainier (even if it wasn't bad) film when you can just use Velvia or Provia 100f?

    That's probably why it didn't last, it was the application that killed it. If Astia had stuck around and there were an Astia400, that would probably have sold more as its good for skin tones (I'm told Astia was best for skin so in this example Astia400 would be good for skin too).



    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,696
    Images
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post
    I almost feel like its the nature of the type of film that beat it... Because you don't shoot models with it (as far as I understand its still more of a landscape film) so you usually have a tripod anyway, so why use a grainier (even if it wasn't bad) film when you can just use Velvia or Provia 100f?

    That's probably why it didn't last, it was the application that killed it. If Astia had stuck around and there were an Astia400, that would probably have sold more as its good for skin tones (I'm told Astia was best for skin so in this example Astia400 would be good for skin too).


    Many years ago I regularly shot the Provia 100 (no 'F') with a pale amber filter; for people photography (which was my interest so many years ago) I like the effect better with a bit of warmth added.

    There was a thread here on APUG last year that bemoaned the odd colour of 400X in artificial light, a sort of "Instagram-look". I remember viewing the pics and thinking they looked very antique by the palette alone. Who posted that thread??

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by RattyMouse View Post
    There is no doubt in my mind that Provia 400X and Neopan 400 are gone world wide.
    That is the general consensus, I think.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    8,093
    Images
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Poisson Du Jour View Post
    Many years ago I regularly shot the Provia 100 (no 'F') with a pale amber filter; for people photography (which was my interest so many years ago) I like the effect better with a bit of warmth added.

    There was a thread here on APUG last year that bemoaned the odd colour of 400X in artificial light, a sort of "Instagram-look". I remember viewing the pics and thinking they looked very antique by the palette alone. Who posted that thread??
    Filters can do wonders,

    I have seen many Kodachrome images with false skin tones, but then recently came upon two random in a box of old enlarger stuff that is certainly Kodachrome but is indeed really beautiful and accurate skin tones. This was taken by my best friends grandfather presumably, he was an amateur but you could tell he really took his time and owned the right equipment for the job. Sadly his house was on a lake and his graflock 4x5 and all his ektachrome 4x5 and Tri-x 4x5's were all covered in mold, this was mold beyond the normal paranoid that I get, like, visibly growing on the equipment, sad how some in old age let their lives go, it's what killed him, living in the mold filled house, I was only there about 30 minutes and already was having trouble breathing.

    Anyway, guess I'll have to enjoy this last brick I have and move on


    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Midlands, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    920
    Quote Originally Posted by Athiril View Post
    I work in a lab, with dip and dunk E-6. I also participate in group film orders from B&H.

    400X is one of the rarest films to come here for processing, and on group orders from B&H also. We get more Kodak E-6 still than 400X.

    Same with Neopan 400 for B&W.
    Personally, I consider 100 speed film more 'specialist' and 400 a 'cover all bases' solution for a multitude of lighting conditions - which the wide eyed consumer tends to shoot in.
    But as others have suggested, it probably has a lot to do with the weather and also the fact that 'consumers', judging by Flickr again, only ever shoot wide open! In which case 100, in daylight, will probably suffice in most places. The idea that 'midday isn't the best time to make pictures' is so ingrained with me, that I probably have no idea what speed/why/or how average Joe consumer shoots film at all!

    You can start to understand how complicated the idea of demographics is in this day and age.
    Last edited by batwister; 07-23-2013 at 12:43 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    'Cows are very fond of being photographed, and, unlike architecture, don't move.' - Oscar Wilde

  6. #26
    Hatchetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    956
    Images
    10
    $16/a roll here in the US. No wonder nobody buys it. Great film though.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    8,093
    Images
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Hatchetman View Post
    $16/a roll here in the US. No wonder nobody buys it. Great film though.
    I don't know where you're getting that but it's about half that...


    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    8,093
    Images
    228
    Ok not half, but not $16 either...

    It was $9 I think before the Fuji increase earlier this year.

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/496810-USA


    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #29
    Hatchetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    956
    Images
    10

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    8,093
    Images
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Hatchetman View Post
    Oh!

    I MOSTLY avoid 35mm haha except for panoramics, but then I use a tripod for sure.


    ~Stone | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin