Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,549   Posts: 1,544,666   Online: 849
      
Page 3 of 32 FirstFirst 12345678913 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 312
  1. #21
    clayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,838
    Images
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Nadvornick View Post
    Look how quickly the black-and-white user base migrated over to Harman. Migrated even away from the staggeringly high-quality (remaining) choices available from Kodak, et al.
    That's a pretty big generalization there. It's not like the "black and white user base" completely abandoned Kodak and Fuji. Last I checked, Tri-X and Tmax are still being sold and used by many.
    Stop worrying about grain, resolution, sharpness, and everything else that doesn't have a damn thing to do with substance.

    http://www.flickr.com/kediwah

  2. #22
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,026
    Images
    65
    A while back, Simon Galley answered this very question on APUG. He said that Ilford (Harman) had no intention to enter the color film market. They did make Ilfochrome dye bleach paper for the Swiss IIRC and it was a pain to produce.

    They do not have the equipment nor the capacity to coat color products on a WW scale, and expansion is expensive for this sort of thing. Kodak has a plant at Harrow which could do the job if Ilford (harman) leased time. IDK how that would work though.

    BTW, Kodak Endura paper is made at Harrow and the boxes are marked "color" not "colour". It saves a pretty pence by leaving out one useless letter.

    PE

  3. #23
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,120
    Quote Originally Posted by nickrapak View Post
    Hmm... Never been a fan of colour film. Personally, color film just suits my style better.
    My sentiments exactly. Why waste a perfectly good vowel.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  4. #24
    Ken Nadvornick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,295
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by clayne View Post
    That's a pretty big generalization there. It's not like the "black and white user base" completely abandoned Kodak and Fuji. Last I checked, Tri-X and Tmax are still being sold and used by many.
    Perhaps.

    But then on the other hand, it's not like Harman continues to slowly but surely discontinue products from their film lines either. Large numbers of Ilford brand b&w users are not migrating to Kodak due to a perception of greater long-term film product availability.

    What was that about "1000 cuts?"

    Ken
    "They are the proof that something was there and no longer is. Like a stain. And the stillness of them is boggling. You can turn away but when you come back they’ll still be there looking at you."

    — Diane Arbus, March 15, 1971, in response to a request for a brief statement about photographs

  5. #25
    Ken Nadvornick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,295
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    A while back, Simon Galley answered this very question on APUG. He said that Ilford (Harman) had no intention to enter the color film market.
    That's why I said "absolutely not." Today would indeed be a horrible point in time.

    But what about five years into the future, as opposed to "a while back." Things change. Changes come unexpectedly. And usually from the least expected directions. (Just ask Mr. Perez.)

    How long was that recent Kodak motion picture stock contract supposed to last? How about after that expires and the theater conversions are complete and all projection is done digitally. How about then?

    Or how about after the final Portra film line has eventually been discontinued and there are no other still photography color options left? How about then?

    It's dangerous to assume that the world will always be exactly as it is/was at any given moment in history.

    Ken
    "They are the proof that something was there and no longer is. Like a stain. And the stillness of them is boggling. You can turn away but when you come back they’ll still be there looking at you."

    — Diane Arbus, March 15, 1971, in response to a request for a brief statement about photographs

  6. #26
    clayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,838
    Images
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Nadvornick View Post
    Perhaps.

    But then on the other hand, it's not like Harman continues to slowly but surely discontinue products from their film lines either. Large numbers of Ilford brand b&w users are not migrating to Kodak due to a perception of greater long-term film product availability.

    What was that about "1000 cuts?"
    I'm not saying I disagree Ken - I'm saying try to be less black and white about it. ;-)
    Stop worrying about grain, resolution, sharpness, and everything else that doesn't have a damn thing to do with substance.

    http://www.flickr.com/kediwah

  7. #27
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,026
    Images
    65
    There are some scenes that cry for color but are shot in B&W. A beautiful field of coiled grasses becomes bland in B&W but would be beautiful in color. I see this so many times on APUG. Don't forget color!

    As for in the future, if Kodak and Fuji left color, it would be for a reason. That reason is cost and ROI. At that point it would be futile for Ilford to enter color.

    PE

  8. #28

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    Advertising!

  9. #29
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,391
    Images
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom1956 View Post
    Advertising!
    To whom?

    People who no longer have TVs or radios, don't read newspapers and don't even have a computer outside of their phone?

    They are where the majority of the "photography" market is heading.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  10. #30
    Ken Nadvornick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Monroe, WA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,295
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    As for in the future, if Kodak and Fuji left color, it would be for a reason. That reason is cost and ROI.
    Absolutely. Cost and (lack of sufficient) ROI at their required minimum production scales. But is it totally and completely impossible to create any color film—either new or reengineered existing—that could be reliably produced at a significantly smaller scale by a third party? Is it truly a figurative choice between either the whole photographic world must use color film to make it minimally viable to produce, or else nothing at all is even possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    At that point it would be futile for Ilford to enter color.
    Would it be futile if they had the entire residual market for color film to themselves? All others had exited that market. All color film was out of production. And they could do it profitably at a significantly smaller scale. Or is color film just so inherently difficult to engineer and produce that the expertise and process required are simply beyond Harman's technical capabilities, now or in the future?

    Ken
    Last edited by Ken Nadvornick; 07-22-2013 at 12:16 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: Damn hyphens...
    "They are the proof that something was there and no longer is. Like a stain. And the stillness of them is boggling. You can turn away but when you come back they’ll still be there looking at you."

    — Diane Arbus, March 15, 1971, in response to a request for a brief statement about photographs

Page 3 of 32 FirstFirst 12345678913 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin