Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,299   Posts: 1,535,776   Online: 740
      
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by pbromaghin View Post
    Ask for hand checking. I always do. That way there is nothing to worry about. The more film, and more exotic film (120 or 4x5), the less objection there is. One time is safe for 800, 2 for 400, 3 for 200 and 4 for 100. That's just 2 trips. No way I'm subjecting my film to that. It's not just the cost of film, but also hotels, plane ticket and rental car, that you're risking to get your shots. And my granddaughter is 10 months old only once.
    This is just paranoia... 1x carry x-ray pass per 100 ISO speed is based on what??? I've put 400 ISO through 16 passes between Asia and the US with no decernible affects; and 3200 at least 6x. The radiation doses your film receives on longer flights at altitude exceeds a pass through carry on back-scatter x-ray machines. Basically, in over 99% of cases, carry on x-ray has no practical impact on film.

  2. #12
    Kevin Caulfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,098
    Blog Entries
    5
    Images
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by craygc View Post
    This is just paranoia... 1x carry x-ray pass per 100 ISO speed is based on what??? I've put 400 ISO through 16 passes between Asia and the US with no decernible affects; and 3200 at least 6x. The radiation doses your film receives on longer flights at altitude exceeds a pass through carry on back-scatter x-ray machines. Basically, in over 99% of cases, carry on x-ray has no practical impact on film.
    I concur.

  3. #13
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,247
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by pbromaghin View Post
    Ask for hand checking. I always do. That way there is nothing to worry about. The more film, and more exotic film (120 or 4x5), the less objection there is. One time is safe for 800, 2 for 400, 3 for 200 and 4 for 100. That's just 2 trips. No way I'm subjecting my film to that. It's not just the cost of film, but also hotels, plane ticket and rental car, that you're risking to get your shots. And my granddaughter is 10 months old only once.
    Most airports outside the US won't do hand checking. The scanners used in UK airports are film safe for even the fastest films for many multiple passes 50+, I met a security officer at Gatwick who sat on the committee that advised on this, made up of people from the film manufacturers, various professional and amateur photographic associations (ironically he was there for the RPS), and the scanner manufacturers.

    It's generally forgotten that ensuring the machines are safe for films also means they are very much safer for the human operatives. At one time only men, and women over child bearing age, were allowed to operate the carry on scanning machines.

    Ian

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    125
    Can someone confirm if the film has been tested with a densitometer?

    I had some 400 speed HP5+ that I took overseas, someone in my camera club has a densitometer and he said the film has more fog than normal. Not sure if this was b/c I had film that was some yrs old or if it was xray related however you can still get nice prints off them. Off the same person he showed a person about fog when you use the fixer too many times but still adhering to Ilfrord's recommendation. He now uses 1L of working solution of fix for 6 rolls.

  5. #15
    Poisson Du Jour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    SE Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,544
    Images
    15
    Nobody at any airport in Canada / Victoria BC and Alaska agreed to hand-checking of my sister's carry-on kit that included one old AF compact film camera. I gave her a roll of Provia 400X and two of Provia 100F; none were affected despite having passed through a total of 16 X-ray inspection points over 4 weeks (including ports visited by the MS Zuiderdam) (!). However, two SD cards for brother-in-law's digi camera were corrupted and we had to contact the photo store in Victoria BC to get copies of the files posted to us (she'd gone there to have "postcards" printed from the card). So... a positive reinforcement for film that has come through shining, but a question mark on the security of SD cards.

    Now, I think it would be very fair to say that Customs around the world are aware of the concerns of film photographers and they are up to date with knowledge as to how safe that film is passing through X-rays. I cannot see anything happening that would cause a catastrophe unless you are running through Delta P3200, which I know will fog after 2 passes — and Customs do acknowledge the risk of X-rays to high speed film, so hold it up to them. No harm in asking for a hand inspection but I doubt you will, or should be afforded, one given that you could potentially be holding up a queue of impatient and irritable people.
    .::Gary Rowan Higgins

    A comfort zone is a wonderful place. But nothing ever grows there.
    —Anon.






  6. #16
    munz6869's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia!
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,044
    Images
    51
    I took 100 rolls of Neopan 100 (120), and 200 sheets of TXP320 (5x4") - Melbourne-Sydney-Tokyo-Frankfurt-Berlin, then Zürich-Hong Kong-Sydney-Melbourne last year, and couldn't find a trace of fogging in anything. I brought back another ten rolls of TMAX400 from Tokyo (the weather was a bit dark at times for Neopan), and that was fine too. At most, that's 7 journeys through carry-on x-ray without anything that would impact on printing when I got back home. I think it's fair to say I will never bother with the HASSLE of hand-inspection...

    Marc!
    Marc Morel
    photographie argentique!
    ------------
    http://mrmarcmorel.wordpress.com/

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,350
    Images
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by craygc View Post
    This is just paranoia... 1x carry x-ray pass per 100 ISO speed is based on what??? I've put 400 ISO through 16 passes between Asia and the US with no decernible affects; and 3200 at least 6x. The radiation doses your film receives on longer flights at altitude exceeds a pass through carry on back-scatter x-ray machines. Basically, in over 99% of cases, carry on x-ray has no practical impact on film.
    Not paranoia, just bad math. I multiplied the exposure instead of adding it.

    I based this on what the government tells us - that film is safe to iso 800. Is it unreasonable then to assume then that 1600 is possibly unsafe? In that case, a 2nd exposure could cause fog on iso 800 film. 2 more exposures could affect iso 400, another 4 could affect iso 200, and so on. I hate to do this, but have to ask for a citation for the comparative levels of exposure in flight vs xray.
    All paths are the same: they lead nowhere. Choose the one that has heart.

    Don Juan

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,035
    Quote Originally Posted by pbromaghin View Post
    I based this on what the government tells us...
    What the government tells us is a summary of an industry study. Here is what the industry study tells us, based on density measures to determine "functional" damage:

    Test Summary

    Color negative film

    The results of this test showed that banding (uneven density areas) was noticed after 25

    passes with ISO 400 color negative film, and after 10 passes with ISO 800 color negative

    film. Prints were made from the ISO 400 film, and it was noticed that there was only a

    minimal color shift through the scan sequences. Also there was loss of contrast, and an

    increase in granularity starting at pass 10 and increased as the number of scans increased.

    This was especially noticeable in the under exposed frames. In each case the base fog

    (density of the unexposed areas) increased with the number of passes. The density of the

    exposed areas increased as well, but in smaller amounts.

    Black and White film


    An uneven fog pattern was noticed, especially with ISO 3200 film between 1 and 5 passes. At 25 passes this effect was extreme.
    Last edited by BrianShaw; 09-23-2013 at 02:17 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,035
    Oh... and here are the industry study recommendations to the governments:

    Recommendations

    Based on the testing completed at the FAA Technical Center in Atlantic City, I3A

    recommends a limit of five passes through the carry-on baggage security check point

    systems for all color negative and reversal film, including single-use cameras, up to and

    including ISO 800 speed film. While in some cases it may take a greater number of

    passes to cause damage to film, we believe that a five pass limit allows for an appropriate

    margin for safety. If lower speed film, ISO 100 through 800, is being carried on

    extended trips, and it is necessary to submit the film through security screeners more than

    five times, travelers should request hand inspection of their film. I3A further recommends

    that all film with an ISO rating greater than 800, black and white films, motion picture

    films, and films used for medical imaging ALWAYS be hand inspected. FAA

    regulations support the request by passengers for hand inspection of film.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,035
    It's all a matter of statistics, and luck. I have had no "functional problems" with slow film (200 and less) but tend not to push my luck beyond 4 to 6 exposures to xray screening... and I always avoid fast film "just because".

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin