Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,274   Posts: 1,534,659   Online: 1099
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Formalin

  1. #1
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,874
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    122

    Formalin

    Found a recipe for universal stabilizer on here from one of PE's old posts...

    Mix one liter of photo flo, and to that add 10 mL of 37% Formalin.

    My question is:

    http://www.sciencecompany.com/-P1638...FUmY4AodvTkAuQ

    Will this above product work effectively as it also contains 15% Methanol as a stabilizer? Would I need to adjust dilutions?
    www.EASmithV.com

    "The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera."— Dorothea Lange
    http://www.flickr.com/easmithv/
    RIP Kodachrome

  2. #2
    heterolysis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Hamilton
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    161
    37% formalin is still 37% formalin.

    As far as I am aware, formaldehyde usually contains methanol so it does not polymerize. And if my research is correct, methanol is sometimes used to help dissolve phenidone, so it's probably film safe.

  3. #3
    Truzi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,023
    You might try amazon.com for cheaper prices.
    Truzi

  4. #4
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,608
    Images
    10
    I don't recall recipes where Phenidone is (pre)mixed with Methanol, and this page indicates that Phenidone isn't all that soluble in Methanol anyway. That aside, given that Formaldehyde appears to be unstable in its pure form, I would say that most people use the Formaldehyde-Methanol mix, knowingly or not, so the mix should work as expected. Note that commercial prebleach or stabilizer recipes tend to use the Formaldehyde-Bisulfite adduct instead, while C41, according to PhotoEngineer, doesn't need Formaldehyde at all any more.
    Trying to be the best of whatever I am, even if what I am is no good.

  5. #5
    Tony-S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    718
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by heterolysis View Post
    37% formalin is still 37% formalin.
    Formalin, by definition, is 37% formaldehyde. 37% formalin would be 0.12% formaldehyde.

  6. #6
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,608
    Images
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony-S View Post
    Formalin, by definition, is 37% formaldehyde. 37% formalin would be 0.12% formaldehyde.
    If Formalin is indeed 37% Formaldehyde, then 37% Formalin would be 0.37 * 0.37 * 100% = 13.7% Formaldehyde. I have no idea where that 0.12% number could possibly come from.
    Trying to be the best of whatever I am, even if what I am is no good.

  7. #7
    Tony-S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    718
    Images
    14
    Yes, you're right. I forgot to multiply by 100 and meant to type 0.14 (14%).

    But still, that's a dramatic difference in the amount of formaldehyde, enough that it would result in questionable stability I suspect.

  8. #8
    heterolysis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Hamilton
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony-S View Post
    Formalin, by definition, is 37% formaldehyde. 37% formalin would be 0.12% formaldehyde.
    Formalin is another common name for formaldehyde when dissolved in water. It can be used regardless of concentration. If you checked the MSDS listed for that specific product you would see it was consisting of 30.0-50.0 wt% formaldehyde, so to me at least it's clear that it is not 14 wt%. As for what the recipe calls for, I'm not sure. It wasn't specified in the original post whether we were talking v/v or wt%, but I made the assumption we were talking about a 37 wt%, 40% v/v, or "100% formalin" solution. It seems unlikely we would be diluting a 37 wt% solution to 37%.

    And I don't know anything about using phenidone first hand, I just read that in an archive somewhere when I was googling the topic. It is capable of forming 10 wt% solutions in methanol if its MSDS is to be believed, though higher concentrations are probably used. Phenidone salts however are unlikely to be soluble in methanol.

  9. #9
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,608
    Images
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by heterolysis View Post
    It wasn't specified in the original post whether we were talking v/v or wt%, but I made the assumption we were talking about a 37 wt%, 40% v/v, or "100% formalin" solution. It seems unlikely we would be diluting a 37 wt% solution to 37%.
    Given that Formaldehyde is a gas, a v/v number is unlikely, so we can safely assume wt%. I do agree that it's extremely unlikely that anyone dilutes a 37% Formaldehyde in water solution down to precisely 37% another time.

    Quote Originally Posted by heterolysis View Post
    And I don't know anything about using phenidone first hand, I just read that in an archive somewhere when I was googling the topic. It is capable of forming 10 wt% solutions in methanol if its MSDS is to be believed, though higher concentrations are probably used. Phenidone salts however are unlikely to be soluble in methanol.
    You may be correct. Here it says "0.1g / ml" which means that the scbt web page likely contains a typo. Given that Phenidone dissolves in water and in Propylene Glycol, I tend to trust the 0.1 g/l number more than the 0.1 mg/l number. I stand corrected.
    Trying to be the best of whatever I am, even if what I am is no good.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin