Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,929   Posts: 1,585,301   Online: 1101
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    53

    What's causing these patterns?

    Hi

    I send my colour film to a lab to develop. Recently I've been getting uneven areas of development, or horizontal 'streaks' - I'm not sure what to call them. I've attached an enlarged detail, as examples. (I've upped the contrast to exaggerate the effect).

    (I don't know whether it's connected, but on a previous roll of film, some of the negatives a tiny areas of hard congealed shiny almost 'varnish' type of substance on the edge of the film.)

    At first I thought this was camera scratches, but this doesn't happen with every roll of film. At the same time, could this be caused by something in the camera?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 1.jpg   2.jpg  

  2. #2
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,796
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Chemical problems typically don't create sharp parallel lines. Sharp parallel lines are more likely caused by mechanical or electronic issues, scratches or dirt on the scanner's lens.

    Are these defects visible on the film with a loupe or just in the scans?
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    53
    I can't see this on the negs, but I'm just using a 50mm lens as a loupe. It doesn't seem as 'deep' as film scratches, which I can see one or two on the negs.

    It's a Plustek 8100 scanner, so it would be hard to check of that's causing anything. There's no problems with other films, as far as I can see.

  4. #4
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,437
    Images
    148
    I'd complain to the lab it's probably caused by their processing machinery. Poor maintenance is usually the problem.

    Ian

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    53
    Just scanned another frame, from a different roll, and it seems fine.

    Edit: Although that was developed by a different lab.

    This is a new (for me) camera (Nikon FM2n), so perhaps I ought to put it in for a CLA. But it seemed so well preserved, that I thought I'd get away with it. Even the light seals seem pretty good.

  6. #6
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,796
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    I'd complain to the lab it's probably caused by their processing machinery. Poor maintenance is usually the problem.

    Ian
    Yep, I'd definitely ask the lab for a redo.

    One wild card here is the quality level of scan that you paid for, not all lab scans are created equal. If you only paid enough to get the basic "big enough" for email or web use scan that would explain the issue too.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  7. #7
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,796
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Roundabout View Post
    Just scanned another frame, from a different roll, and it seems fine.

    Edit: Although that was developed by a different lab.

    This is a new (for me) camera (Nikon FM2n), so perhaps I ought to put it in for a CLA. But it seemed so well preserved, that I thought I'd get away with it. Even the light seals seem pretty good.
    If both rolls went through this same camera then the camera probably isn't the variable causing the problem.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    232
    On the first image (1.jpg) the lines are not parallel to the frame edge. Unless it was rotated after scanning, this excludes he camera or processing machine. Taking a clue from: "on a previous roll of film, some of the negatives a tiny areas of hard congealed shiny almost 'varnish' type of substance on the edge of the film" I'd guess the lab had some processing issue and clumsily tried to wipe the film clean. Go to another lab if you have the choice; if you have no choice, try to politely educate them.

  9. #9
    AgX
    AgX is online now

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,092
    To me the structure looks like brushed. Not to explain with a camera defect and hard to explain with a processor fault.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    53
    Thanks.

    Just to confirm, I've made the scans myself and it's not an electronic issue. Scanning the same frames produces the same results and frames developed elsewhere scan fine.

    I tend to agree that it's the lab and not the camera. But, like the first reply from markbarendt, I wondered about the straight lines. I thought that it might be something to do with the film rubbing against something.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin