Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,549   Posts: 1,544,588   Online: 874
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Athiril's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, Vic, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,532
    Images
    28

    Pre-flashing colour film

    One of the first films I tried with this was Superia 800 XTRA shot at 12800, with a C-41 process time of 6 minutes.

    EI 12800 no pre-flash


    EI 12800 + Zone III pre-flash (Zone III for 12800 that is) - lesser pre-flash amounts did nothing.



    I had been planning to apply this to Agfa CT Precisa as well (the made by Fuji stuff), I found N+4 development gave horribly bad dMax on a blank strip of film with no exposure though, so I abandoned that and went normal processing.

    The results with Precisa in normal processing is much more mild of a difference, but it is there. I deliberately underexposed the shots to make sure there were some very low values to have something the pre-flash could affect.


    Underexposure + Zone 0 pre-flash (for EI 100) <-- found no real difference without a pre-flash



    Underexposure + Zone I pre-flash (for EI 100) <-- found a noticeable small difference, texture on black clothes, detail on black bags, etc.





    I suspect a heavy push significantly helps pre-flash, and will improve contrast and detail in that area of the pre-flash, as with the neg results. In order to do that, I would need to use either a custom first developer with less solvent, or a pre-developer using a normal B&W developer before standard E-6 process. Given I have access to an E-6 processor, that is the easier simpler way for me to try it out to see how much I can squeeze out of Precisa.


    easier to see difference:


    Last edited by Athiril; 01-06-2014 at 11:25 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,601
    You can also differentially correct shadow color bias relative to overall color balance by using CC or light balancing filters for just the preflash.
    I've never been particularly fond of preflahsing, but it is useful to know about.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1
    would this work if you post flashed?

  4. #4
    Dr Croubie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    rAdelaide
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,272
    Images
    2
    I'm also curious to know, how exactly did you pre-flash? In the camera, with double-exposure or something? And what was the light source, an actual speedlite flash or something?
    Or was the whole film unspooled, pre-flashed with an enlarger or such, then re-wound?

    I'd be interested to try this with something like Velvia (obviously with a lot of experimentation), get some details in them thar shadows, even at stock EI50 with no pushing.
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.

  5. #5
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,653
    Images
    10
    If you read Tadaaki Tani's book, there is a good explanation why this works. As silver halide crystals receive exposure, they will produce silver atoms on their surface. One silver atom alone is unstable and will go away after short time. Two silver atoms in a cluster are stable, but not developable, Tani calls them latent subimage centers. Only with three (sulfur gold sensitized) or four (sulfur sensitized) silver atoms in a cluster will the grain become developable. If your Zone I preflash creates many latent subimage centers, a much lower final exposure will create developable grains and as a result image detail.

    One thing, though: PE has mentioned a few times here, that the most modern films use two electron sensitation, which I interpret as "a cluster of two silver atoms renders the grain developable", which means such films won't benefit from a preflash. Note, that Athiril uses films that may not have two electron sensitation, as they are a bit older than e.g. new Portra 400.

    @pennyf: very low exposures will form only one silver atom on the grain, and this is not only not developable, it is also unstable and will go away in a very short time frame. It is unlikely that you will see a benefit from a post flash, but YMMV.
    Trying to be the best of whatever I am, even if what I am is no good.

  6. #6
    analoguey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bangalore, India
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    648
    Images
    2
    How did you determine the zone for pre-flashing? I thought pre-flashing was only for paper -interesting to see film use of it.
    (Still unsure of how you can actually do it though)

    Sent from Tap-a-talk

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,601
    I've never cared much for the effect of pre-flashing anything, but did learn to do it correctly, and will admit it's a nice analog method for color
    correcting shadows only. In the field the best way is to have a translucent sheet of white diffusion mylar that fits in a gel filter holder. Mount
    this on your lens (out of focus), with an optional color correction filter. Then expose a blank white sheet of matboard, assuming your camera
    has double-exposure capability. It takes a practice round to determine the exact amt of exposure needed. But it will be a number of stops
    less than your primary exposure, depending on the specific film you use, and the combined density of the items in your filter holder.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin