Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,303   Posts: 1,536,264   Online: 827
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,936

    B&W Prints from B&W Negs on RA4 Paper

    Seeing the recent thread on: "Why is B&W Paper So Expensive" has led me to think about what filtration might be a starting point for B&W prints from B&W negs on RA4 paper.

    My local mini-lab manages to do this and produce almost colour-cast-free prints but it has the advantages of a machine that tells it what is needed.

    With a normal dichroic head has anyone tried to make B&W prints from B&W negs on RA4 and if so any ideas on at least a starting filtration.If there is/are threads on this please point me to them

    I am hoping that if the correct filtration can be worked out to get a neutral print then it should be hopefully possible to stick with that filtration for at least the rest of the roll

    I currently have no idea how to work out how to even start on achieving the correct filtration nor can I recall any book I have ever come across that mentions this.

    Part of the reason may be that most colour books are quite old and were published when RA4 paper was much more expensive than B&W paper which certainly isn't the case now so there was no reason to even try to do this

    Thanks

    pentaxuser

  2. #2
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,285
    Images
    60
    It would help if you first filtered the light with the orange mask built into colour negative film. A blank (clear) piece of colour negative film sandwiched with your black and white negative would do the trick.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  3. #3
    Jim Taylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Yorkshire, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    136
    There are a couple of threads around that mention this.

    I've tried it with some success by using an old piece of developed colour negative film leader sandwiched in the carrier to provide the orange mask for the benefit of the paper. It have me a good, warm-toned b&w print, but contrast needed attention.

    Whilst I was doing this (and trying reversal processing some colour slides onto RA4 paper) my darkroom sink split and stopped play! I've just about out finished the replacement of the sink and other mods, so hoping to be back in after Easter. Will dig out and scan some prints then.
    Cheers,

    Jim.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Taylor View Post
    but contrast needed attention.
    Yup. Color neg film is much lower contrast the B&W film (so RA4 paper is high contrast by B&W standards).

  5. #5
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,247
    Images
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by MattKing View Post
    It would help if you first filtered the light with the orange mask built into colour negative film. A blank (clear) piece of colour negative film sandwiched with your black and white negative would do the trick.
    Is it possible to put this in a different portion of the light path, such that the extra piece of film does not add any extra dust to the print? I was thinking perhaps of using a larger piece, like a piece of 120 film below the lens, perhaps?
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  6. #6
    Chris Lange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    748
    Images
    33
    Better yet a developed but unexposed sheet of 4x5 cut to fit in the lamphouse would do it.
    See my work at my website CHRISTOPHER LANGE PHOTOGRAPHY

    or my snaps at my blog MINIMUM DENSITY
    --
    If you don't have it, then you don't have it.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lower Earth
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,003
    The RA4 prints will last an indeterminate time, then fade (don't ask how I know), and the true B&W paper will give higher quality prints of known permanency. So like most things in photography, if it's cheaper, there's a reason. So you could, but.....
    Last edited by momus; 04-14-2014 at 07:33 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #8
    Chris Lange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    748
    Images
    33
    ^^^agreed.

    It is worth it to keep in mind that by going RA-4 with b/w negs, you are giving up VC dodging/burning control, any form of true toning, as well as various archival characteristics. Additionally, you're limited basically to out of date Kodak paper, and Fuji FCA (which, albeit, is fabulous color paper, but far from my first choice in black and white printing).
    See my work at my website CHRISTOPHER LANGE PHOTOGRAPHY

    or my snaps at my blog MINIMUM DENSITY
    --
    If you don't have it, then you don't have it.

  9. #9
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,285
    Images
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Lange View Post
    ^^^agreed.

    It is worth it to keep in mind that by going RA-4 with b/w negs, you are giving up VC dodging/burning control, any form of true toning, as well as various archival characteristics. Additionally, you're limited basically to out of date Kodak paper, and Fuji FCA (which, albeit, is fabulous color paper, but far from my first choice in black and white printing).
    Chris:

    There is lots of current Kodak colour paper available in rolls, at very reasonable prices.

    How about the equivalent of 255 sheets of 8"x12", for $70.00: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...ns_8_x255.html ?
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    North Yorkshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    720
    B&W Prints from B&W negs on RA4 paper is indeed possible. I use an LPL 6700 enlarger with the 35mm carrier but on to of the carrier I lay a square of 120 film that came from a part exposed but developed C41 film. I don't actually have any problem with contrast and when using Fuji Crystal Archive paper a filtration of 25magenta and 35 yellow gives me a print that is very similar in tone to Ilford warm tone B&W paper. Those filtration values of course will alter according to your darkroom and RA4 chemicals used, but they will be a good starting point. The exposure times tend to be a little longer than for straight forward RA4 with C41 film, I assume due to the extra film density and any tint in the B&W film base..

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin