Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,338   Posts: 1,537,658   Online: 1013
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Brunswick , Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    86

    RA-4 Developer and Blix formula wanted

    Would anyone have a good formula for RA-4 Developer and Bleach/Fix that they would like to share.

    Thanks
    Rob.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    There are the ones on this website:

    http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/pho..._chemicals.htm

    I think PE doesn't like them-)

    I'm not sure it makes sense to make your own. The kits from Fotochem aren't that expensive. Or the bulk chemicals from people like Fuji or Kodak aren't that bad either. Blix will keep. In my expierence even the developer keeps fairly well.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Brunswick , Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    86
    Nick,
    I bought one of the fotochem kits a few weeks ago but I was kind of worried about using it because all the bottles of chemicals I got were labeled C-41!!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,940
    This may be where the big pond divides us as far as chems are concerned but I have used Tetenal and then Paterson. This is based on U.K. prices and availability but I found Paterson to be considerably cheaper but equally as good.

    Pentaxuser

  5. #5
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,972
    Images
    65
    There was a URL to a new RA developer posted on PN about a month ago. It looked pretty good. All of the previous errors I saw in it were fixed. It is almost like the real thing!

    Not all kits out there are good. Never use a CD4 based kit or formula for paper.

    PE
    Last edited by Photo Engineer; 01-25-2006 at 09:23 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Stew
    Nick,
    I bought one of the fotochem kits a few weeks ago but I was kind of worried about using it because all the bottles of chemicals I got were labeled C-41!!

    Did you complain? IIRC the RA-4 kit is five bottles. I think three for the developer and two for the blix.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woonsocket, RI USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,725
    I've used the one linked to by Nick with (to my subjective eye) good results, using Kodak and Fuji papers. I can't speak to archival qualities, though. Another one is described here:

    http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~k...technical.html

    This might be the one to which PE referred, but I'm not positive of that. I've not yet tried it, since it contains some chemicals I haven't tracked down. (I've not tried all that hard, but I'm pretty sure I checked some of the popular photochemical suppliers, such as Photographer's Formulary and Art Craft.)



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin