Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,696   Posts: 1,482,526   Online: 1005
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    jmailand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Belmont Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    151
    Images
    20

    Is this acceptable for the gallery

    I just processed some c41 images taken with my Horizont panorama camera. I not set up in my darkroom to make color prints so I have to scan If I want to put any of them in the gallery. I have 2 ways to scan them, with my Canon flatbed scanner with is not very good with making sharp scans of small negatives, or using my dedicated Minolta film scanner which make much better 35mm scans, but will only let me scan "one" fame at a time. With the Minolta scanner I scan both halves of the "same" negative a reassemble them with a simple stitch program. I was wondering if this digital reassembly of a "one frame, one shot" negative would be considered acceptable for posting in gallery. If use the Canon scanner I have to "unsharp mask" the hell out of the them just to make the look like the true sharpness in the negative. With the Minolta film scanner I don't have to do any sharpening, which seems to me less of a digital manipulation than using a simple stitch program to get to 2 halves of one negative back together.

    Anyway I was looking for opinions on how people feel about this.

    Thanks James.
    Last edited by jmailand; 07-20-2006 at 09:06 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: spelling error in title.

  2. #2
    jmailand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Belmont Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    151
    Images
    20

    revision to first post.

    I should ad that by saying "one frame" at a time for the Minolta scanner , I mean it will only scan at the 24 by 35mm "regular" frame/negative size. The Horizont takes a 24 x 65mm frame/negative picture, with a one scanning/sweeping motion of the lens onto the film, thus it is a true panorama camera.

    James,
    Last edited by jmailand; 07-20-2006 at 09:22 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: grammar

  3. #3
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,808
    Images
    29
    James, I have a Horizon camera, I make a small print and scan that.

    Basically, if you are fiddling to get a true representation of your negative/print, it shouldn't matter.

    My take on it is:- one does have to do some fiddling, to get the electronic version looking remotely like the analogue original.

    Mick.

  4. #4
    roteague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,672
    Images
    18
    Negative/transparency scans are generally allowed in the gallery. I wouldn't have a problem with what you are asking, but others may not feel the same way, so let's give them a chance to respond. I'm glad you asked.
    Robert M. Teague
    www.visionlandscapes.com
    www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

    "A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer

  5. #5
    Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,517
    Blog Entries
    7
    Images
    15
    My take on it is:- one does have to do some fiddling, to get the electronic version looking remotely like the analogue original.
    Exactly.

  6. #6
    Andy K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sunny Southend, England.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,422
    Images
    81
    Hi James.

    If you plan on making a lot of panoramic photographs you might consider getting hold of one of the Epson Perfection series of flatbed scanners. They also scan negs . The interesting part is you can also get them to scan the whole strip as well as individual frames. This came in very handy when I was making double exposures and wanted to see where to crop the frame.

    Here is a scan I made just now using my Epson Perfection 2480 Photo. As you can see it covers almost four frames, which should be plenty for scanning Horizon frames.


    -----------My Flickr-----------
    Anáil nathrach, ortha bháis is beatha, do chéal déanaimh.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,565
    Images
    47
    IMHO, we have to digitize any image to post here. Scan 'em, stitch 'em, and post 'em, and we can all have a look.

    Rick.
    Rick Jason.
    "I'm still developing"

  8. #8
    DBP
    DBP is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,882
    Images
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy K
    Hi James.

    If you plan on making a lot of panoramic photographs you might consider getting hold of one of the Epson Perfection series of flatbed scanners. They also scan negs . The interesting part is you can also get them to scan the whole strip as well as individual frames. This came in very handy when I was making double exposures and wanted to see where to crop the frame.

    Here is a scan I made just now using my Epson Perfection 2480 Photo. As you can see it covers almost four frames, which should be plenty for scanning Horizon frames.
    That's why I bought mine. It does a decent job, too, as evidenced by my latest photo posted.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,630
    What we seem to be faced with is either a poor scan or a much better scan to look at, enjoy, critique etc. The only difference being that the better scan has to be stitched.

    As the whole gallery can only exist by scanning anyway i.e. involves a digital process then surely it's a no brainer to allow the stitching scanner. All it does is to give us a better representation of what is on the neg. Even were we to insist on it being a print scan, I'd still want the best i.e. most authentic, representation of waht's on the print by whichever scanner achieved this.

    pentaxuser

  10. #10
    jmailand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Belmont Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    151
    Images
    20
    I just uploaded to my gallery a example of what I thought was the best from the first roll I developed. (called Still Lake)

    I should add to my original post that my Canon flatbed is their top of the line 9950f with FARE their version of Digital ICE. While my Minolta is the Dual Scan IV.I also have a Epson 1650 Perfection flatbed. I just think having true lens optics with focusing like the Minolta is just better than any flatbed scanner. Too bad Canon and Minolta both stopped making dedicated film scanners.

    James,



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin