Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,931   Posts: 1,556,927   Online: 1104
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Uncle Bill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oakville and Toronto Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,371
    Images
    311

    Shooting with Kodachrome 64 in 35mm

    Got a question for the studio audience, I experimented with Kodachrome 64 and I shot the roll with a polarising filter on the lenses I used which for the record is Zuiko with my OM-4. I find the images on the dark side, should I have left UV/Haze/1a filter on the lens? Up until now I have been shooting with Fuji Velvia 100 for the record.

    Bill
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Old Muscle.jpg   Vintage BMW.jpg  
    "Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once and a while, you might just miss it."
    Ferris Bueller

  2. #2
    Dave Parker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,049
    It looks like your meter may have not been working right? they seem to be about 1 stop under what they need to be? did you do any independant metering of the scene? The UV would not have made any difference and did you have the ISO set up correctly in your camera?

    Little more information would go a ways to help you out Bill.

    If you could, post your exposure data, f/stop, lens, speed or anything else you recorded.

    Dave

  3. #3
    Uncle Bill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oakville and Toronto Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,371
    Images
    311

    I think the meter is fine on the OM-4

    I shot some Velvia a few weeks later with the results posted below and we all know how tricky that film is to play with.
    I shot with (going by memory here) a 28 f3.5 Zuiko lens opened up about halfway with a polariser on the front. It was a partly cloudy hazy day mid afternoon.

    Bill
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Canadian Ranger 2.jpg   Toronto Skyline 1.jpg  
    "Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once and a while, you might just miss it."
    Ferris Bueller

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wi
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3,242
    I do not think that using a haze filter would have done much except perhaps add a slight warth to the shadows. To me it looks like it is about 2/3 to 1 stop under-exposed. K64 is a somewhat contrasty film.
    Claire (Ms Anne Thrope is in the darkroom)

  5. #5
    DBP
    DBP is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,885
    Images
    34
    Are the slides really that dark, or is there a scanning artifact here? Kodachrome can be tricky to scan.

  6. #6
    copake_ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NYC or Copake or Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4,092
    Images
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by DBP
    Are the slides really that dark, or is there a scanning artifact here? Kodachrome can be tricky to scan.
    I think it is what you are mentioning. I use a Nikon 5000D scanner - and it has a "special" Kodachrome setting.

    I also think the image is somewhat under exposed. I did a little brightening (gosh - that sounds like English weather) in PS CS2 and "found" the white door in the upper right hand corner.

    Here's a "side by side" - Bill's image first, PS'd on the right. Of course the shot is "deteriorated" by reiteration...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Old Muscle.jpg   Old Muscle 2.jpg  

  7. #7
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    Bill, your K64 looks normal to me. Your highlights do not seem blown up, and the shadows can only be dark as they are, given the nature of the scene ; it could have used maybe a half stop more of exposure, but not much more.

    I've always found that that film had a bit more "70's brown" in its palette than modern E6 emulsions. You won't get the same type of saturation you get with those films, so your shadows may become darker more quickly, and the lower saturation/deep shadow makes the overall contrast less intense to the eye. Pictures taken with it always look a bit as if they are coming from a 1974 magazine.
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  8. #8
    Matt5791's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    England, Birmingham
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    998
    Images
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Bill
    I shot some Velvia a few weeks later with the results posted below and we all know how tricky that film is to play with.
    Bill
    I think that K64 (or any Kodachrome) is definitely more tricky to play with than Velvia.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Near Tavistock, Devon, on the edge of Dartmoor.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,035
    Quote Originally Posted by mhv
    Bill, your K64 looks normal to me. .
    Agreed (within the confines of the variables of digitising, etc.)
    I've found the opposite to be the case. Having been a life-long user of mainly Kodachrome, I was disappointed to hear of the impending US-only processing and inevitable delay when sending from Europe. Thus, I have been looking at alternatives. When I see the Fuji and Ektachrome slides taken by myself and others, my initial reaction is that they are a little overexposed compared with K64, but take a day's break and look at either in isolation and they look OK. I don't think there's any right or wrong, just "different".

    Best wishes,

    Steve

  10. #10
    digiconvert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cannock UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    809
    Images
    51
    From my limited experience your K64s look Ok to me,as someone else has noted it is more contrasty than E6 films , hence the lack of detail in the shadows. If you look at the background in the BMW shot the shops over the way seem to be correctly lit.
    K64 is also a beast to scan. If I am going to scan I have found that 1/2 a stop overexposure (yes on slides !) gives a better chance of getting an image you can work with. You can also have a bit of fun with some normally exposed slides and get a 'retro look' as here.



    I like K64 a lot, I am trying other slide films but keep going back to it for its contrast and clarity- just me I guess - but it is one of the great advantages of film that you can choose a different film for a different look.

    Keep shooting !
    Chris
    Hmm- Wonder if she'd notice if I bought that :)



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin