Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,556   Posts: 1,545,128   Online: 1094
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    copake_ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NYC or Copake or Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4,092
    Images
    56

    Recommendations: Portra NC or VC?

    My wife, Theresa and I are taking a quick trip down to FL over the upcoming MLK long weekend.

    Of course, we're expecting sunny skies and warm temps!

    For B&W I'm planning to bring the CV R2S with 35, 50 and 85mm lenses using HP5+. I'm also going to bring the F100 with both a 28mm and a 35-70mm zoom for color shooting.

    For color shooting, since I've already arranged for the sunny skies, I've settled on bringing some Portra 160 for the color film.

    The question is: NC or VC?

    I'm mainly planning on outdoor shooting rather than taking family snaps - but may take some of those too. My first inkling is to use NC - any thoughts?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,066
    NC has nice smooth tonality for portraiture. It doesn't have the "zing" for other apps. Take VC, even your family happy snaps will be nice.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    ABQ
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    127
    I would not use either of them for general photography. The films are very demanding.
    Kodak 100UC is so much easier to handle.

  4. #4
    copake_ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NYC or Copake or Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4,092
    Images
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by sbelyaev View Post
    I would not use either of them for general photography. The films are very demanding.
    Kodak 100UC is so much easier to handle.
    Thanks for your advice. I took this "grab shot" with 160NC last September:

    http://www.apug.org/gallery/showphot...0&ppuser=10367

    Anyone else?

  5. #5
    Zathras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    507
    Quote Originally Posted by copake_ham View Post
    Thanks for your advice. I took this "grab shot" with 160NC last September:

    http://www.apug.org/gallery/showphot...0&ppuser=10367

    Anyone else?
    I think you should take his advice!!! I looked at your example and it's obvious that you don't know what yer doing:o

    But seriously folks, George's example has convinced me to give the 160NC a go. I wanted to try Portra 160, but I was having trouble in deciding which one. Since I am looking for accurate color rendition and am not into garish color saturation, I have finally made up me poor feeble mind. Thanks George!.

    Mike Sullivan

  6. #6
    copake_ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NYC or Copake or Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4,092
    Images
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Zathras View Post
    I think you should take his advice!!! I looked at your example and it's obvious that you don't know what yer doing:o

    But seriously folks, George's example has convinced me to give the 160NC a go. I wanted to try Portra 160, but I was having trouble in deciding which one. Since I am looking for accurate color rendition and am not into garish color saturation, I have finally made up me poor feeble mind. Thanks George!.

    Mike Sullivan
    Zathras,

    Thanks. I'm leaning toward the NC. My guess is that the VC is mainly intended for "flattering" portrait shots of the bride and "happy couple" that brings out the makeup and rouge etc.

    BTW: I think this film is amazing - particularly the way... (APUG gods please forgive what I'm about to write)...it scans.

    The Great Yellow Father isn't kidding when he says this film has "enhanced" scannability.

    I'd still be interested whether anyone would recommend VC instead.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    346
    I'm probably the ignorant minority here but I shot the four free Portra rolls Kodak sent us last year and I'm buying the VC. I find the NC too flat - color wise - for my taste. I like the extra punch in the color rendition even for landscapes and cityscapes. Keep in mind I'm living and working in South Texas in an area heavily influenced by Hispanic culture and the love for bright colors on everything. Something that you might keep in mind if you're heading into the greater Miami area. Color is always subjective.

  8. #8
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by sbelyaev View Post
    I would not use either of them for general photography. The films are very demanding.
    Kodak 100UC is so much easier to handle.

    Are you kidding? Portras are the easiest films to deal with. You can underexpose them almost two stops, and over-expose them maybe five stops without significant image degradation!

    At any rate, George, I would say go with the NC if you are going to shoot high-contrast subjects, as may be the case in Florida. VC has more saturation, but also a tad more contrast. But the extra kick in the colors of VC is nice as well, just watch for shadow detail.

    I use NC all the time for flash photography (on-camera with diffuser, for events), which is a very contrasty light setup.
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  9. #9
    Sanjay Sen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,251
    Images
    4
    Here's another vote for the NC. Does that help?

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    ABQ
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by mhv View Post
    Are you kidding? Portras are the easiest films to deal with. You can underexpose them almost two stops, and over-expose them maybe five stops without significant image degradation!

    At any rate, George, I would say go with the NC if you are going to shoot high-contrast subjects, as may be the case in Florida. VC has more saturation, but also a tad more contrast. But the extra kick in the colors of VC is nice as well, just watch for shadow detail.

    I use NC all the time for flash photography (on-camera with diffuser, for events), which is a very contrasty light setup.
    It is much easier to scan UC100 than any of those portras.
    In terms of grain they are very similar.
    I don't like the look of portras in high contrast situatins (the shadows are too dark). NC gives muted colors.
    I doubt that there are better studio films than Portra, but for snapshots, particulary in sunny and colorful Florida, UC line of kodak film could be a better choice.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin