Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,274   Posts: 1,534,630   Online: 1071
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Xax
    Xax is offline

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    13

    getting most out of C41 chemistry?

    hi

    i recently bought a jobo cpa-2 (same as cpe2?) and started my own c41 developing, have developed 6 rolls so far, looked good!

    now i am quite uncertain how to handle the chemistry to get the most rolls out of it!

    i poured the used chemicals (once 500ml for 4 rolls and once 250ml for 2 rolls) back to the bottle with the "fresh" solution, same with bx and stab

    is this going to falsify my results by the time i reach lets say 12 rolls?

    it somehow says 30 or 40 rolls of 35 or 120 on the package, but inside it says only 12 films per litre of solution... isn't this really just scre*ing the customer? the salesman said 30-40 rolls as well...

    now whats to believe? how much am i going to get out of a c41 tetenal colortec kit for 1 litre of chemicals?

    thanks for any information regarding this!

    regards from vienna!

  2. #2
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,002
    Images
    117
    Yes.

    You can use the same developer on multiple rolls across multiple dev sessions, but you have to extend the dev. times based upon the qty of film that has come before. I used this method in school, but I can not remember the formula. If you keep pouring the used developer back into the 'stock' then the stock will slowly become dilute and your results will become inconsistent and eventually worthless -- unless you get some replenisher and add it to the stock in accordance to the directions. Same with bleach and I'd just throw out the fixer as it is cheap enough and I'm not familiar with fixer replenishment.

    regards from vancouver

    *

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    I've got fixer "replenisher". It's the same stuff that's used up to make up my normal fixer just the mixing is slightly different.

    Replenishing isn't that hard. So I replenish bleach and fix.

  4. #4
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Milan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,002
    Images
    117
    No replenishing is easy, I've just never done it for fix.

    *

  5. #5
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,829
    Images
    29
    This solution capacity with rotary processing seems to be a vexed question with C41.

    Kodak invented the process and the chemical composition other companies have made variations, I myself mix C41 from scratch, all are slightly different.

    The official C41 capacity for 1l of developer from Kodak, is 4 rolls of 36 exposure, which isn't very much.

    I believe that Tetenal products have a higher concentration of the colour developing agent, allowing a slightly higher capacity, what that is, if it is a fact even, I don't know.

    Using empirical methods and having (at the time) access to control strips and a lab technician to read the developed strips, I found that with one shot processing on my Jobo CPE2 and 4 rolls of 36 frame film in 500ml of solution, I have excellent results which were inside the C41 control parameters.

    Using that as a guide, I always end up processing 8 rolls per 1l of developer.

    Rotary processing is different to deep tank developing and normal replenishment procedures. If you have a 4 litre deep tank and process 4 rolls of 36 frame C41, you will not come close to depleting the developer. At the end of the cycle you should replenish the bath by adding 52ml of replenisher developer per roll, which in this case would mean 208ml

    However with rotary developing you are using (by comparison) minute amounts of developer and you effectively deplete the solution, it should be discarded. That is the official way, but I have cheated in the past and will occasionally do so.

    In short there are so many methods used with excellent results, pick one that works for you and stick to it.

    If you are able to get excellent prints from your film and have no colour crossover problems, then stay with your system.

    30 to 40 rolls out of a 1l solution which is used undiluted, seems completely wrong to me. Maybe the label is partly wrong and is off a B&W developer packet by mistake?

    Mick.
    Last edited by Mick Fagan; 02-17-2008 at 02:33 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: Additional information

  6. #6
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,517
    Tetenal advises 3 runs per working solutions.
    The maximum/L and run would be 4 films 135, which means a total efficiency of 3x4films/L = 12films/L

    The same comes true for the Amaloco or the Ornano chemistry for instance.

    The developing (Blix) times for Tetenal (others give other times!) are:

    1-4: 3`15`` (4`)

    5-8: 3`30`` (6`)

    9-12: 3`50`` (10`)

  7. #7
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,517
    In addition Kodak relates the efficiency of their Flexicolor chemistry to the speed of the films developed.

    I did not read such concerning other brand's chemistries.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    123
    I use 150ml per 120 roll or 36 exp 35mm of Kodak flexicolor LORR. I don't know if the low replenishment chemicals (LORR) are different. I am sure Ron (Photo Engineer) has posted before that Kodak used to give much higher rates of developing capacity than the current data sheets would indicate, and, that there has been no significant change in the formula. He even posted an old data sheet to confirm. I think he he uses only 100ml per film but don't take my word for it. I can tell you that 150ml gives great results. It also suits the capacities of the 1, 2, 5, and 6 reel 35mm Jobo tanks on the 2500 series that I use. For what it's worth, I wouldn't advise you to replenish your developer. You can however replenish your bleach and fixer using 3ltr pop bottles. Dan Schwartz has posted instructions on photo.net so I'd google it.

  9. #9
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,829
    Images
    29
    Just doing some lateral thinking here, AgX has displayed the different times for each successive developing run.

    One possible problem could be if you do two lots of four rolls, at the different times as suggested, which makes sense to me.

    But if on your third and final run you only have one roll to develop and you put it into the bath and develop it for 3'50" instead of the normal 3'15", you may be push processing!

    Because the bath has the capacity to develop 4 rolls, but you are only developing 1, I think there may be a possible over development.

    C41 developing is nominally 3'15", a push of one stop, is an additional 30 seconds, making it 3'45". I would think it is possible to accidentally push a roll, something to think about.

    By the way C41 can effectively be pushed 2 stops, 3'15" is normal, 3'45" is a one stop push and 4'15" is a two stop push.

    I have tried doing another 30 second push with various C41 films but it doesn't really work.

    Mick.

  10. #10
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,517
    Mick,

    From a theorethical point of view all these time shedules fail, if you don't use them per full capacity each run.

    If you would make two fresh working solutions of 1L and process manually 4 135/36 films in the one and only 1 135/12 in the other batch I'll guess you'll get different results.

    However, in the latter case you would rather reduce the volume used to just the height neccessary for one reel, thus reducing the overdeveloping failure.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin