Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,948   Posts: 1,194,847   Online: 804
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    tiberiustibz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tufts University
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,748
    Images
    5

    Second E6 developer

    Does the second E6 developer need to be controlled as closely as kodak says? Could it be used at room temp with no ill effects? Assuming it develops to completion, I see no reason why not unless the temperature interferes with the CD somehow...

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Van Buren, Arkansas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,410
    Images
    101
    Yes, to avoid color shifts, it needs to be within 1 degree. There may still be third party E-6 processing kits that work at room temperature, but the results won't be as good as Kodak, run as Kodak requires.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    262
    Images
    1
    Why not try it with a test roll/strip?

    Oh, and if you do try make sure you let us know!

    Someone on the flickr forums has stand developed C41 at room temp and it doesn't look too bad (and that's definitely not Kodak recommended!) - who knows about colour shifts though...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Van Buren, Arkansas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,410
    Images
    101
    With C-41 you can "sorta" correct for off-temperature processing color shifts when you make prints (or scan) if you are not too picky, however a transparency is an end product. Harder to correct for processing flaws.

  5. #5
    tiberiustibz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tufts University
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,748
    Images
    5
    I know that the first developer must be closely regulated to prevent cross over, but since the second developer develops to completion, I see no reason why I could not use room temp, except slowing the development.

  6. #6
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    20,018
    Images
    65
    It is diffusion dependant, even if going to completion and so can lead to problems. At low temps, who says that the couplers have the same activity or the DIAR fragments have the same diffusion rate? If they change, the crossover and color shifts take place!

    PE

  7. #7
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,897
    Information on this matter seems confusing.

    Tetenal once stated that for the first developer 1°C variation would yield 0.1 colour density variation and that Kodak's and theirs 0.3°C max tolerance should not deterr you.

    For the first rinse in the Tetenal 3-bath! process the reduced 0.5°C tolerance is stated by Tetenal as crucial as any residue of first developer will be activated in the following high ph CD.
    In a magazine test the temperature of the first rinse for the 6-bath process was reduced even down to 20°C without visible effects.

    For the colour developer Tetenal stated that minor variation of temperature will have no influence and the time may be between 4 and 8 minutes without visible variation in density. However in an attached overview they at the same time even reduce the max. tolerance from Kodak's 1°C to 0.5°C for their 3-bath process...

  8. #8
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    20,018
    Images
    65
    Kodak tests show that pH, time and temperature will affect the CD if too low or high for pH, too low or too short for temp and time..... This is due to the reaction rates of couplers which have different kinetic responses to these factors. This leads to changes in contrast, dmax and color balance. Kodak's color darkroom dataguide used to show the effects of all of these on E6. IDK if the new book has them.

    PE

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    553
    My bet is you would see big differences between using the Color Developer at room temp and at 38C. why bother? If you can get the first developer to 38C why not get the Color developer there too? I imagine the Fix could run at room temp if you gave it more time (not Blix or Bleach).

  10. #10
    tim_walls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Croydon & Leeds
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,037
    Images
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Photo Engineer View Post
    Kodak tests show that pH, time and temperature will affect the CD if too low or high for pH, too low or too short for temp and time..... This is due to the reaction rates of couplers which have different kinetic responses to these factors. This leads to changes in contrast, dmax and color balance. Kodak's color darkroom dataguide used to show the effects of all of these on E6. IDK if the new book has them.
    I don't think this is the dataguide to which you refer, but one of my very few bookmarks is the Kodak Publication Z-119 - Using KODAK Chemicals Process E-6. As found here:
    http://www.kodak.com/global/en/busin...als/z119.jhtml

    Sections 12 (Visual Troubleshooting of Process E-6), 14 (Diagnostic Charts) and 15 (Control-Chart Examples) are probably the most relevant here.
    Another day goes under; a little bourbon will take the strain...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin