Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,948   Posts: 1,194,847   Online: 804
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    los angeles
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    454
    I like it... lol
    - got possibilities...



    Per Volquartz


    http://www.pervolquartz.com

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by per volquartz View Post
    I like it... lol
    - got possibilities...
    Wow! The Autochrome has been relaunched.
    Well done!!

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB, Canada
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    814
    I had a roll of Provia 400X cross-processed a few months ago, and it came out grainy, but not like that.

    If you're trying to see if you like the effect, I'd try a fresh roll and a different lab and see what happens.
    i can't wait to take a picture of my thumb with this beautiful camera.

    - phirehouse, after buying a camera in the classifieds

  4. #14
    jd callow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Mooreville
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,985
    Images
    117
    cool

    *

  5. #15

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    505
    I'm going, poor scanning technique by the lab. If scanned on a frontier, have it rescanned with sharpness set at low 2

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,032
    Images
    2
    I would bin the rest of that lot!

  7. #17
    wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bruce Peninsula, ON, Canada
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,067
    Quote Originally Posted by pokerplayer269 View Post
    'Allo. I recently purchased 12 rolls of expired (5/2002) Fuji Sensia 200 slide film and shot a few rolls at a local show I went to. I got the film cross processed as C41 and then scanned at a local camera shop. The scans had a ridiculous amount of grain and at first I thought something was wrong with their scanner as the grain looked more like digital noise than film grain. I got a frame printed at Walgreens to check this but the print came out just as grainy as the scan from the camera store. I know that cross processing increases grain, but the grain in these photos is insane. In fact I think there is more grain in these photos than the grain in a roll of 800 speed film I shot a while ago. Does expired film increase grain? Is it possible something happened during development? Here is one of the scans from the roll: http://i39.tinypic.com/11158qp.jpg
    Let me get this straight, you look film that expired 6½ years ago, and you processed it in chemistry it's not intended to be processed in, and your surprised that the results don't look good?
    Paul Schmidt
    See my Blog at http://clickandspin.blogspot.com

    The greatest advance in photography in the last 100 years is not digital, it's odourless stop bath....

  8. #18
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    It would take a great deal more "grain" than shown in the samples for me to dismiss the film/ process as "unuseable". One has only to consider the works of Ralph Gibson, where he used Anscochrome 1000 pushed mercilessly two and three stops. The grain was (yeah, I know, from inefficient memory) more pronounced than here, and I think it "made" the tone and mood of the works (a wonderful, beautiful, series of nudes).

    Grain - Simply another "tool in the box".
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  9. #19
    Domin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Warszawa, Poland
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by wogster View Post
    Let me get this straight, you look film that expired 6½ years ago, and you processed it in chemistry it's not intended to be processed in, and your surprised that the results don't look good?
    I've done a lot of that, and even more (more expired film + more unintended chemistry) and the results rarely looked that bad. For sure I've never seen such mess with cross processing slide in a good lab.

    It clearly looks to me as badly processed (bad bleach?) and/or underexposed and/or badly fogged at the start.

    About duplicating this effect - I have a exposed roll of EPP waiting for C41 with no bleach. It might or might not give similiar effect.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin