Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,736   Posts: 1,670,371   Online: 907
      
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 61
  1. #51
    michaelbsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Carolina
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,106
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by 6x9
    I shoot 6x9 only in medium format. I vote for more 220! I rather carry my camera and 20 rolls of 220 then my camera and 40 120 rolls.
    All of my 6x9 have a red window.

    Do you have something that does not? Can you tell me what camera it is?
    Michael Batchelor
    Industrial Informatics, Inc.
    www.industrialinformatics.com

    The camera catches light. The photographer catches life.

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    26
    Images
    1
    Maybe Kodak does not want any of the Portra 220 sales to be bled off by Ektar in 220. I know they are different films. But my last order was some Portra specifically to have some 220.

  3. #53
    6x9
    6x9 is offline

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Japan/America
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelbsc View Post
    All of my 6x9 have a red window.

    Do you have something that does not? Can you tell me what camera it is?
    The Fujis.
    I have changed my password and changed my email to a random email. This is forum seppuku. Good bye!

  4. #54
    Ektagraphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southeastern Massachusetts
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,875
    Images
    23
    I just picked up a pack Portra 400VC in 200. It will be my first 220 experience. We'll see how it goes.
    Helping to save analog photography one exposure at a time

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Ektagraphic View Post
    I just picked up a pack Portra 400VC in 200. It will be my first 220 experience. We'll see how it goes.
    I think i can safely predict (assuming you already know and like the emulsion - i can't predict whether you will or not else) how it will go: you will notice that you have to change film less.
    Also that you have to carry fewer rolls of film.

  6. #56

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,006
    Images
    4
    The posts about how making 220 is not all that different from making 220 may be true, but ignore the market.

    If 220 was profitable, it would likely be done.

    The problem is lack of demand, the way I see it...and the lack of demand comes from ignorance of the product.

    You would be surprised just how many medium format film photographers are out there who don't even know 220 exists, or who know it exists, but have never used it, because they simply don't know that it is the same, only better for most purposes. I know people who will shoot roll upon roll of 120, using a film that is available in 220, with the same development to be performed on all the rolls, while their 220 inserts for their back sit in their camera bag never to be used again. Then they will pay $6 per roll to develop the 120 rolls, instead of paying $8 per roll to develop half as many 220 rolls. When I ask why, they have no answer, but continue to go on using 120 only.

    120 is the more versatile film, as I cannot think of a camera that shoots 220, but not 120, but I can think of plenty cameras that shoot 120 only.

    ...but with all the people out there who own relatively modern medium format cameras like Hassies, RB/RZs, Bronicas, Pentaxes, etc., and the fact that these people very often (if not most of the time) shoot more than 10 to 15 shots in a shoot (sometimes shooting dozens to hundreds of pix, in fact), all intended for the same type of development, the lack of use of 220 film amazes me.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,682
    Quote Originally Posted by 2F/2F View Post
    [...] I know people who will shoot roll upon roll of 120, using a film that is available in 220, with the same development to be performed on all the rolls, while their 220 inserts for their back sit in their camera bag never to be used again. Then they will pay $6 per roll to develop the 120 rolls, instead of paying $8 per roll to develop half as many 220 rolls. When I ask why, they have no answer, but continue to go on using 120 only.
    I have an answer to that: over here, 220 film costs more per roll than two rolls of 120.
    And having a roll of 220 processed costs exactly twice as much as having a roll of 120 film processed (same 2x costs also applies when you do it yourself).

    So bottom line, using 220 film costs more.
    And for many, many things, a roll of 120 film is too long already.

    So it does not amaze me that i don't use 220 film more at all.

    I still do though, when having to carry a good amount of film, and will expose a good amount to before having any of it processed.
    I'm still undecided about whether i like Ektar, but am quite happy with Portra, which is still available in 220. I would love to have T-Max in 220 too though.

  8. #58
    hrst's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,300
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by 2F/2F View Post
    The problem is lack of demand, the way I see it...and the lack of demand comes from ignorance of the product.

    You would be surprised just how many medium format film photographers are out there who don't even know 220 exists, or who know it exists, but have never used it, because they simply don't know that it is the same, only better for most purposes.
    You are now at the heart of the problem.

    This happens every now and then in all fields, some products just don't "catch fire". It's sometimes quite an uncontrolled, almost random process.

    And, I'm not ignoring the marketing aspect, quite the opposite. I've been saying it's just the marketing. And furthermore, as the marketing has to change anyway, there could be a new possibility for some 220 films at the same time. People buy more and more from big stores via Internet, so store shelf space doesn't matter anymore, as doesn't minimum order amounts that are problematic with small, local stores. But in addition to this, people should be told that 220 film exists! It's a great format, not for all but for many.

  9. #59
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,905
    All I can say is don't hold your breath waiting for it.
    Ben

  10. #60

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Carbondale, IL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    229
    It would be great...but....I dont think that it will happen any time soon. It may be worth a try, though.
    M. David Farrell, Jr.

    ----------------------------------------------
    ~Buying a Nikon doesn not make you a photographer. It makes you a Nikon owner!

    ~Everybody has a photographic memory, but not everybody has film!

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin