Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 55,958   Posts: 1,148,846   Online: 1097
      
+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 315 FirstFirst 123456789101454104 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 3149
  1. #31
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    6,539
    Images
    122
    Even if it is technically a copyright violation, I doubt if it was one they would complain about. There is certainly no loss to Kodak or any defamation involved.

    Lets get back to mourning the loss of Kodachrome. I have not used it much but it does seem sad to see it go.

    It would be nice if a resurrection campaign would bring it back as happened with Velvia 50 but I'm not very confident of that.



    Steve.

  2. #32
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,713
    Images
    29
    PKM-25, good show.

    Mick.

  3. #33
    Alex Bishop-Thorpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,417
    Images
    29
    Oh bollocks
    Heavy-Arts, my blog.
    The Prospect Project, my big project.

    Worry less. Photograph more.

  4. #34
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    6,539
    Images
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleath View Post
    Oh bollocks
    That's certainly one way of putting it!


    Steve.

  5. #35
    dwdmguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Freehold, NJ
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    819
    My post is not the official Kodak Press Release, but it is a news story that properly cites the source as a news organization would.

    Correct. If you do not have written permission to cite in whole or part, this would be in infringement. I don't want to take the time of going thru how as I'm just not in the right timeframe for it, but we really should remember, it's not whole or part when it comes to our images, why should it be so for other media? In any event, please do a bit more homework and you will see how it does indeed infringe.

  6. #36
    dwdmguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Freehold, NJ
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    819
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Smith View Post
    Even if it is technically a copyright violation, I doubt if it was one they would complain about. There is certainly no loss to Kodak or any defamation involved.

    Lets get back to mourning the loss of Kodachrome. I have not used it much but it does seem sad to see it go.

    It would be nice if a resurrection campaign would bring it back as happened with Velvia 50 but I'm not very confident of that.



    Steve.
    That' blows me away. I won't write anymore as I guess I don't want to take away from the thread, but the hypocrisy of photographers knows no bounds.

  7. #37
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New York, New York
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,128
    Images
    20
    Press releases exist for the purpose of quotation. Most corporate PR departments would be delighted if their press releases were published verbatim in their entirety. It is absurd to consider quotation of a press release a copyright violation.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  8. #38

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Western Masstts. USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    273

    Kodak Retires Kodachrome

    Quote Originally Posted by PKM-25 View Post
    Your posting is a celebration of the life of a memorable product. Thank you.
    "Get over it."

  9. #39

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Western Masstts. USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by Akki14 View Post
    Don't care about color slide film as it's incredibly unlikely to be printed in an analog way these days anyway. I am more upset about the death of polaroid because it renders my favourite camera useless. You still have lots of options out there for food for your camera even if it isn't the filet mignon you've been used to.
    Have you tried FP-100 Fujifilm?
    "Get over it."

  10. #40
    PKM-25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Aspen
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    584
    Images
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by dwdmguy View Post
    If you do not have written permission to cite in whole or part, this would be in infringement.
    Correct is right, not only do I have written permission to cite it from Kodak, but I have disclosed further support of this to David Goldfarb in confidence that you are simply not privy too, this will put it all to rest.

    I applaud you for being a watchdog for copyright infringement, but I can assure you that in this particular case, you are really wasting your time and creating an unnecessary distraction from the topic.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin