Press releases exist for the purpose of quotation. Most corporate PR departments would be delighted if their press releases were published verbatim in their entirety. It is absurd to consider quotation of a press release a copyright violation.
I am in full agreement. In my organisation (University of Plymouth) we constantly strive to produce press releases that are difficult for the media to present out of context by quoting only in part. If only our PRs were always quoted in full (with or without quotation marks) our lives would be so much more straightforward. Let common sense prevail!
I'm glad that I've been around long enough to have been able to use some of the great emulsions when they were freely available; Agfa, Polaroid, now Kodachrome. I'd hate to be a young photographer starting out in a few years & hearing about all the great films that are no longer available.
Ah well, when I've stocked up with my last Kodachrome, that's the end of my business with Kodak. Fuji for color, Ilford for B&W, still plenty of suppliers for photochemicals and d------l supplies. Who needs Kodak now?
I do.
Digital Photography is just "why-tech" not "high tech"..
While I shoot mostly black and white film, I have shot slide and Kodachrome and I mourn the loss of this historic film. That being said this day was going to come sooner or later. So for those still sitting on a few rolls, find the right project and make it count.
Now I do have to say in the same post I really like Ektar 100, I am happy that Kodak put the money in to develop it and the fact I can drop off a roll at any C-41 lab is a LOT more convienent than shipping Kodachrome to Dwanes which is expensive from Canada these days.
"Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once and a while, you might just miss it."
Ferris Bueller